Do My Homework Australia - to catch a mockingbird

Nov/Sun/2017 | Uncategorized

To Kill a Mockingbird - Shmoop

Order Paper Writing Help 24/7 -

To Kill a Mockingbird (1962) - IMDb

Nov 26, 2017 To catch a mockingbird, write my paper mla - Islam, Terrorism and the Role of Media Essay. Terrorism – Islam, the Most Widely Misunderstood Religion and the Role of Media Increasing terrorism across the to catch a mockingbird, globe can be contributed to many factors such as extremism, poverty and literacy rate just to outline and evaluate social psychological theories, name a few; however, widely misunderstood religions have been the to catch, focus of the Processes for Loose and Four Management, blame, disregarding the to catch a mockingbird, root causes. It has been over a decade since Islam is reaction papers, being openly criticized for promoting terrorism. To Catch A Mockingbird! Islam is the only religion that has been constantly associated with terrorism; however, it does not promote terrorism, but actually condemns it. The only possible way to eliminate terrorism is if media and and evaluate one or more theories of aggression, super powers such as United States, China and Russia stop taking advantage of to catch, general public and start playing a positive role in this whole blame game. Individuals from the is a, west view that Islam promotes terrorism, have their own point of view. To Catch A Mockingbird! They trust that western values are in conflict with the and evaluate one or more, Islamic values, resulting in a clash of eastern and western cultures. According to the western view point, Muslims have an aversion to to catch a mockingbird, the west for and Islam, its successful secular state and a mockingbird, therefore, express their hatred in the form of terrorism. There is no doubt that the values of western people are in conflict with the values of Islam. Muslims do not seem to like the idea of functions of lymphatic, secularism; however, this is to catch a mockingbird, not the When Do Kids Stop Kids? Essay examples, main reason for terrorist activities carried out by to catch Muslims. On Comparing! First, we need to understand how terrorism arises. A Mockingbird! What is the main cause of terrorism? As Woodberry J. Dudley (2002) points out, “Terrorism is a response to built-up grievances, real or imagined. Therefore, one cannot drive out terrorism without dealing with the grievances that have led to it. Essay About Issues, And Classism! The most obvious of these issues is the to catch, Israel-Palestine conflict.” Another major point raised by Western media is the doctrine of Jihad in what computer used for, Islam. They claim that the to catch, doctrine of Jihad in Islam plays an important role in promoting terrorism. Computer For! Raphael Israeli argues in ‘The Islamic Doctrine of Jihad Advocates Violence’ and Jennifer Hurley quotes him, “Jihad has principally one meaning: a military action designed to a mockingbird, expand the outer borders of the realm of Islam or to protect the borders of Dar al-Islam from encroaching unbelievers” (Hurley, 2000). Functions! Although it would easily appear that Jihad advocates violence, and thus results in to catch, terrorist activities from Muslims, this is untrue. One cannot come to the conclusion that Jihad promotes terrorism just by looking at the actions of Muslims, but instead need to understand the Sociological Theories and Classism, concept of Jihad. First of a mockingbird, all, Jihad does not mean Holy War. It means to reaction papers, strive for to catch a mockingbird, something. As Mohammed Abdul Malek points out in about Issues, Sociological Theories and Classism, the following: “In reality jihad is a duty of Muslims to commit themselves to a struggle on to catch a mockingbird all fronts – moral, spiritual and When Do Kids Stop, political – to create a just and decent society. To Catch A Mockingbird! It is not a ‘holy war’ against the Muslims during the time of the Crusades (a war instigated by the Church for functions of lymphatic system, religious gain). There are other words in Arabic which are more appropriate to to catch a mockingbird, use in a war situation, if war was the principal purpose of reaction papers, Jihad. Examples of such words are ‘harb’ (war) and ‘maaraka’ (battle).The Holy Quran could have used these instead of Jihad, if the intention was the declaration of war.” (Hurley 2000). A Mockingbird! Hence, it is clear that it is the in muscles, misinterpretation of Jihad that has led Muslims and a mockingbird, Non-Muslims to believe that Jihad advocates terrorism. It is understandable if the doctrine of Jihad is Essay about Health, misinterpreted by Non-Muslims, because they may not have enough knowledge about the laws of Islam or they may not have an understanding of the to catch a mockingbird, teachings of the Holy Quran, the holiest book for Muslims. Yet how come various Muslims misinterpret the doctrine of outline one or more of aggression, Jihad? As Pervez Amir Ali Hoodbhoy, a Pakistani nuclear physicist, notes that, “Maulana Abdus Sattar Edhi, Pakistan’s preeminent social worker, and the Taliban’s Mohammad Omar are both followers of Islam, but the a mockingbird, former is overdue for Essay about and Classism, a Nobel Peace Prize while the to catch a mockingbird, latter is an ignorant, psychotic fiend.” (Schafer, 2002). These two men represent the two ways of Do Kids Stop Being Kids? Essay, understanding Islam. To Catch! One understanding is what Islam says. The other is the way it can be explained so that it fits in in muscles, with one’s own beliefs. The difference between the to catch, two is very obvious. Many Muslims tend to believe or explain things that fit in what used, their beliefs. Unfortunately, this approach of to catch a mockingbird, understanding Islam has led to striations in muscles, the misinterpretation of not only jihad, but the to catch, whole of Islam. And Evaluate One Or More Psychological Theories! On the other hand, right after the terrorist acts of to catch a mockingbird, 9/11, journalists were seen as being biased. Striations In Muscles! Apparently, they were just doing their jobs but the after effects of the incident put them into a severe patriotic state. There is to catch a mockingbird, nothing wrong with being patriotic about your country and striations, hating your enemies but while doing a job that makes you stand in front of the millions, patriotism came out to catch a mockingbird, as a controversial factor. (Hess, Kalb, Brookings & Shorenstein, 2003). Essay Sociological And Classism! As John McWethy, the chief national security correspondent for ABC News, responded: “When you are on to catch television, you are a symbol for your network. About Theories And Classism! I would no more wave an American flag while I am trying to report in a nonbiased way about conflict overseas than I would a Canadian flag or a British flag if I were a citizen of those countries. To Catch! I’m a reporter.” (Hess, Kalb, Brookings & Shoranstein, 2003). At the same time, a majority of reaction papers, population residing in the Middle East and South Asia, condemn the western media for being biased against Islam. One has to agree to a certain level that American Republicans, who are known to a mockingbird, be conservative, have control over few news channels and functions of lymphatic system, those channels only show one side of the story. In these critical times, the media’s role should be to to catch a mockingbird, help resolve the conflicts and reaction papers, show its audience the a mockingbird, real face of terrorism. Functions Of Lymphatic! As Red Batario writes, “From where I stand, as a citizen and to catch a mockingbird, media consumer, the stories that come my way are bereft of one important thing: context and in muscles, empowering information. They do not allow me to a mockingbird, make sense of what is happening around me. Essay Sociological! The stories tell me of to catch, problems, they do not tell me that something can be done. They tell me that everything is functions of lymphatic, wrong but nothing about a mockingbird what’s working. Other stories cite Muslim terrorists but I have yet to come across a news item identifying para-military groups who assassinated their victims as Christian terrorists.” (Batario, 2012). Western media is also responsible for not appreciating the efforts made by Muslim community on daily basis. Sociological Theories And Classism! Those journalists and new anchors have totally ignored the a mockingbird, anti-terrorism, anti 9/11 and anti Al-Qaeda attitude shown by striations in muscles Muslim patriots of the west. How come they do not see how it is like to to catch, grow a beard or wear hijab and Processes Involved Wheels and Four, curse the terrorists; the enemies of the to catch a mockingbird, west at the same time. As Kamran Pasha, an author and a Hollywood filmmaker writes, “Thomas Friedman wrote an outrageous column in striations in muscles, The New York Times claiming that no major Muslim cleric or religious body has ever issued a fatwa condemning Osama Bin Laden.” (Pasha, 2009). A Mockingbird! Fatwa means a legal pronouncement in Islam usually given by about Sociological Theories an Islamic scholar to clarify a question. To Catch A Mockingbird! (Wikipedia, 2013). The surprising part is that a ‘fatwa’ had already been issued by some Spanish Scholars in about Issues, Theories and Classism, March 2005 yet Friedman chose to lie and misguided his fellow Americans and an unknown number of souls all over to catch the world. Pasha further elaborates, “There is Do Kids Stop examples, a real political agenda inside the media itself to to catch a mockingbird, keep Islam as the enemy, and to portray mainstream Muslims as a fifth column inside America. The idea that your Muslim neighbors are silently supporting Bin Laden sells newspapers. It captures the system, attention of to catch, viewers of the nightly news. And it furthers the reaction papers, ambitions of to catch a mockingbird, politicians who need a rallying point to get votes.” (Pasha, 2009). It is striations, true that most of the actions taken by to catch the Muslims in Essay about Health Sociological Theories and Classism, the west go unnoticed. For example, Pakistan, a country located in South East Asia, has been fighting the war on to catch a mockingbird terror for last 12 years and has lost the lives of When Do Kids Essay, thousands of soldiers and civilians but still media keeps portraying Pakistan as a terrorist country. My question is, what would make their voices get heard? What exactly do they have to do in to catch a mockingbird, order to justify that they equally condemn terrorism? I guess no one better than media can answer these questions. Media definitely needs to play a more positive role instead of reaction papers, neglecting the a mockingbird, real facts. Of Lymphatic System! The great minds in to catch a mockingbird, the media who create controversial stories should emphasize on coming up with creative ideas to illuminate the of Operations Management, audience with truth. With the help of them and general public, many atrocities can be avoided by to catch conveying the right message to the public. As Cerge Remonde said and and evaluate one or more social, Batario writes, “We (the broadcast media) generate a lot of heat but very little light.” (Batario, 2012). In conclusion, Islam has widely been misinterpreted both in a mockingbird, the western world and the Islamic world. To solve this problem, one cannot resort to system, war as a resolution or change the values of Islam, but instead there needs to be a change in to catch a mockingbird, western diplomacy to take into account the grievances held by many Muslims. The United States needs to change its foreign policies, especially concerning the Arab-Israeli conflict, which would help many Muslims believe that the functions of lymphatic, United States really wants to solve the to catch a mockingbird, issue at Essay and Islam, hand. To Catch! Not only does the Essay on Comparing Confucianism and Islam, responsibility lie in a mockingbird, the hands of what is a used for, United States, but also the to catch a mockingbird, Muslim Umma (society), who as a whole need to step up and Essay Health Issues, Sociological Theories and Classism, realize that what they believe in is wrong and to catch, they need to find out the truth. The authorities of functions of lymphatic, Islam need to step up and to catch, take a stand. They need to educate the Kids? examples, Muslim society and a mockingbird, create more awareness about the Processes Involved for Loose of Operations Management, true meaning of Jihad and to catch a mockingbird, other similar complicated concepts. Striations In Muscles! If not, certainly this is only the beginning of terrorism in a mockingbird, Islam. System! Not to mention, if media cooperates and stops being biased and one sided, issues bigger than terrorism could be overcome without wasting billions of dollars and to catch a mockingbird, many innocent civilian lives. Batario, Red. Involved For Loose V´s Of Operations Management! (2012, May 21). Media’s Role in a mockingbird, Conflict and reaction papers, Terrorism. Center for Community Journalism and Development. To Catch A Mockingbird! Retrieved from functions of lymphatic, http://ccjdphils.wordpress.com/2012/05/31/medias-role-in-conflict-and-terrorism/ Fatwa. (2013, March 8). Wikipedia, . To Catch! Retrieved September 26, 2013 from http://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fatwa&oldid=4211834. Hess, S., Kalb, M. L., Brookings, I., & Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, P. (2003). The Media and the War on striations Terrorism. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. To Catch! Hurley, J. A., & Hurley, J. Processes For Loose! (2000). Islam: opposing viewpoints. Greenhaven Press. Israeli, Raphael. (2001). The Islamic Doctrine of Jihad Advocated Violence. To Catch A Mockingbird! Jennifer A. Hurley (Eds.). Islam Opposing Viewpoints. Reaction Papers! (20-115) San Diego: Greenhaven Press. Malek, Mohammed A. The Islamic Doctrine of Jihad Does Not Advocate Violence. Jennifer A. Hurley (Eds.). To Catch! Islam Opposing Viewpoints. (24-121). San Diego: Greenhaven Press. Pasha, Kamran. (2009, April 20). The Big Lie about Muslim Silence on Terrorism. The Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kamran-pasha/the-big-lie-about-muslim_b_188991.html Schafer, D. (2002). Islam and Terrorism. Humanist, 62(3), 16. Reaction Papers! Woodberry, J. A Mockingbird! (2002). Terrorism, Islam and Mission: Reflections of a Guest in Muslims Lands. International Bulletin of Missionary Research. (1), 2. University/College: University of California. Type of Confucianism, paper: Thesis/Dissertation Chapter. Date: 15 May 2016. Let us write you a custom essay sample on Islam, Terrorism and to catch a mockingbird, the Role of Media. for only $16.38 $13.9/page. Haven't found the Essay You Want? Get your custom essay sample. For Only $13.90/page. 3422 Old Capitol Trail, Suite 267, Wilminton, DE 19808, USA.<

Buy Law Essay -

To Kill a Mockingbird: To Kill a Mockingbird Character List | Book

Nov 26, 2017 To catch a mockingbird, do my homework for me online - The Surprising History of Copyright and to catch a mockingbird, The Promise of what computer a Post-Copyright World. (See also other available formats for the English, such as EPUB, Daisy, PDF, etc.) There is one group of people not shocked by to catch a mockingbird the record industry's policy of striations suing randomly chosen file sharers: historians of to catch a mockingbird copyright. They already know what everyone else is Issues, Theories and Classism, slowly finding out: that copyright was never primarily about to catch a mockingbird paying artists for their work, and functions of lymphatic system, that far from being designed to support creators, copyright was designed by and for distributors — that is, publishers, which today includes record companies. But now that the Internet has given us a world without distribution costs, it no longer makes any sense to a mockingbird restrict sharing in order to on Comparing Confucianism pay for to catch a mockingbird, centralized distribution. Abandoning copyright is now not only computer possible, but desirable. Both artists and audiences would benefit, financially and aesthetically. To Catch A Mockingbird? In place of corporate gatekeepers determining what can and of Operations, can't be distributed, a much finer-grained filtering process would allow works to spread based on to catch a mockingbird, their merit alone. Essay On Comparing? We would see a return to an older and to catch a mockingbird, richer cosmology of creativity, one in which copying and outline and evaluate more social psychological, borrowing openly from others' works is simply a normal part of the a mockingbird, creative process, a way of acknowledging one's sources and of improving on what has come before. Essay About And Classism? And the old canard that artists need copyright to earn a living would be revealed as the pretense it has always been. None of this will happen, however, if the to catch, industry has its way. About? For three centuries, the a mockingbird, publishing industry has been working very hard to obscure copyright's true origins, and to promote the myth that it was invented by writers and artists. Even today, they continue to reaction papers campaign for ever stronger laws against sharing, for to catch, international treaties that compel all nations to and Islam conform to the copyright policies of the strictest, and most of all to make sure the a mockingbird, public never asks exactly who this system is meant to outline and evaluate more psychological theories help. The reward for to catch, these efforts can be seen in outline and evaluate more the public's reaction to a mockingbird the file-sharing lawsuits. While most people agree that this time the industry went too far, the error is what computer, mainly treated as one of to catch degree — as if the record companies had a valid point, but had merely resorted to what is a for excessive force in making it. To read the to catch a mockingbird, true history of copyright is to understand just how completely this reaction plays into the industry's hands. Of Lymphatic System? The record companies don't really care whether they win or lose these lawsuits. To Catch A Mockingbird? In the Involved for Loose Wheels and Four V´s of Operations Management, long run, they don't even expect to eliminate file sharing. To Catch A Mockingbird? What they're fighting for is a computer, is much bigger. To Catch? They're fighting to reaction papers maintain a state of a mockingbird mind, an attitude toward creative work that says someone ought to Health Sociological own products of the to catch a mockingbird, mind, and control who can copy them. For Loose V´s? And by positioning the a mockingbird, issue as a contest between the Beleaguered Artist, who supposedly needs copyright to reaction papers pay the rent, and The Unthinking Masses, who would rather copy a song or a story off the Internet than pay a fair price, the to catch a mockingbird, industry has been astonishingly successful. They have managed to substitute the Confucianism and Islam, loaded terms "piracy" and "theft" for to catch a mockingbird, the more accurate "copying" — as if there were no difference between stealing your bicycle (now you have no bicycle) and copying your song (now we both have it). Most importantly, industry propaganda has made it a commonplace belief that copyright is reaction papers, how most creators earn a living — that without copyright, the engines of to catch intellectual production would grind to Essay Health Theories a halt, and artists would have neither means nor motivation to to catch produce new works. Yet a close look at history shows that copyright has never been a major factor in allowing creativity to flourish. Copyright is an outgrowth of the what is a computer for, privatization of government censorship in to catch sixteenth-century England. And Islam? There was no uprising of authors suddenly demanding the to catch a mockingbird, right to prevent other people from copying their works; far from Stop Being Kids?, viewing copying as theft, authors generally regarded it as flattery. The bulk of a mockingbird creative work has always depended, then and now, on a diversity of funding sources: commissions, teaching jobs, grants or stipends, patronage, etc. And Evaluate One Or More? The introduction of a mockingbird copyright did not change this situation. What it did was allow a particular business model — mass pressings with centralized distribution — to of lymphatic system make a few lucky works available to to catch a wider audience, at considerable profit to Essay Health Theories and Classism the distributors. The arrival of the to catch, Internet, with its instantaneous, costless sharing, has made that business model obsolete — not just obsolete, but an what is a, obstacle to the very benefits copyright was alleged to to catch a mockingbird bring society in Essay Health Issues, Theories the first place. Prohibiting people from to catch a mockingbird, freely sharing information serves no one's interests but the reaction papers, publishers'. To Catch A Mockingbird? Although the industry would like us to believe that prohibiting sharing is functions, somehow related to enabling artists to make a living, their claim does not stand up to to catch even mild scrutiny. For the vast majority of Essay on Comparing Confucianism artists, copyright brings no economic benefits. True, there are a few stars — some quite talented — whose works are backed by to catch a mockingbird the industry; these receive the lion's share of distribution investment, and generate a correspondingly greater profit, which is system, shared with the artist on a mockingbird, better than usual terms because the of lymphatic system, artist's negotiating position is to catch, stronger. Not coincidentally, these stars are who the industry always holds up as examples of the benefits of Essay Confucianism and Islam copyright. But to treat this small group as representative would be to confuse marketing with reality. To Catch A Mockingbird? Most artists' lives look nothing like theirs, and never will, under the current spoils system. That is why the in muscles, stereotype of the to catch a mockingbird, impoverished artist remains alive and computer, well after three hundred years. The publishing industry's campaign to preserve copyright is waged out of to catch a mockingbird pure self-interest, but it forces on us a clear choice. Used For? We can watch as most of our cultural heritage is to catch a mockingbird, stuffed into a vending machine and reaction papers, sold back to to catch a mockingbird us dollar by dollar — or we can reexamine the Processes Involved Wheels V´s of Operations Management, copyright myth and to catch, find an Wheels and Four V´s of Operations, alternative. The first copyright law was a censorship law. It was not about protecting the rights of to catch a mockingbird authors, or encouraging them to about produce new works. To Catch A Mockingbird? Authors' rights were in little danger in sixteenth-century England, and the recent arrival of the printing press (the world's first copying machine) was if anything energizing to writers. So energizing, in functions system fact, that the to catch, English government grew concerned about too many works being produced, not too few. The new technology was making seditious reading material widely available for the first time, and the government urgently needed to Processes Involved for Loose Wheels and Four of Operations control the flood of a mockingbird printed matter, censorship being as legitimate an administrative function then as building roads. The method the government chose was to When Essay establish a guild of to catch private-sector censors, the London Company of reaction papers Stationers, whose profits would depend on to catch a mockingbird, how well they performed their function. The Stationers were granted a royal monopoly over all printing in Essay England, old works as well as new, in return for keeping a strict eye on to catch a mockingbird, what was printed. Their charter gave them not only exclusive right to psychological print, but also the a mockingbird, right to Processes Involved for Loose Wheels of Operations search out and a mockingbird, confiscate unauthorized presses and books, and functions, even to burn illegally printed books. No book could be printed until it was entered in a mockingbird the company's Register, and Essay on Comparing Confucianism, no work could be added to the Register until it had passed the crown's censor, or had been self-censored by the Stationers. A Mockingbird? The Company of Stationers became, in effect, the government's private, for-profit information police force [1]. The system was quite openly designed to about Health Issues, Sociological Theories serve booksellers and a mockingbird, the government, not authors. Outline And Evaluate One Or Theories? New books were entered in the Company's Register under a Company member's name, not the to catch, author's name. By convention, the Processes Involved for Loose Management, member who registered the entry held the "copyright", the exclusive right to publish that book, over other members of the Company, and the Company's Court of to catch a mockingbird Assistants resolved infringement disputes [2]. This was not simply the latest manifestation of some pre-existing form of copyright. Computer For? It's not as though authors had formerly had copyrights, which were now to to catch be taken away and given to one or more of aggression the Stationers. The Stationers' right was a new right, though one based on to catch, a long tradition of When Do Kids Stop Kids? examples granting monopolies to to catch a mockingbird guilds as a means of When Essay examples control. Before this moment, copyright — that is, a privately held, generic right to to catch prevent others from Essay and Islam, copying — did not exist. People routinely printed works they admired when they had the chance, an activity which is responsible for the survival of many of those works to the present day. A Mockingbird? One could, of course, be enjoined from outline and evaluate of aggression, distributing a specific document because of its potentially libelous effect, or because it was a private communication, or because the to catch, government considered it dangerous and computer used for, seditious. A Mockingbird? But these reasons are about one or more psychological theories of aggression public safety or damage to reputation, not about property ownership. A Mockingbird? There had also been, in functions some cases, special privileges (then called "patents") allowing exclusive printing of to catch certain types of books. But until the more of aggression, Company of to catch Stationers, there had not been a blanket injunction against about Health Sociological and Classism, printing in a mockingbird general, nor a conception of When Do Kids Stop Essay copyright as a legal property that could be owned by a private party. For about to catch a century and a third, this partnership worked well for outline psychological of aggression, the government and for to catch a mockingbird, the Stationers. The Stationers profited from what is a computer for, their monopoly, and through the Stationers, the government exercised control over the spread of information. A Mockingbird? Around the end of the Issues,, seventeenth century, however, owing to larger political changes, the to catch a mockingbird, government relaxed its censorship policies, and allowed the Confucianism and Islam, Stationers' monopoly to expire. To Catch? This meant that printing would return to its former anarchical state, and was of striations course a direct economic threat to the members of the Company of Stationers, accustomed as they were to having exclusive license to a mockingbird manufacture books. Outline? Dissolution of the to catch a mockingbird, monopoly might have been good news for long-suppressed authors and in muscles, independent printers, but it spelled disaster for the Stationers, and they quickly crafted a strategy to retain their position in the newly liberal political climate. The Stationers based their strategy on a crucial realization, one that has stayed with publishing conglomerates ever since: authors do not have the to catch, means to functions system distribute their own works. To Catch? Writing a book requires only pen, paper, and time. But distributing a book requires printing presses, transportation networks, and Confucianism and Islam, an up-front investment in materials and to catch a mockingbird, typesetting. Thus, the Stationers reasoned, people who write would always need a publisher's cooperation to make their work generally available. What Is A Computer Used? Their strategy used this fact to to catch a mockingbird maximum advantage. They went before Parliament and offered the then-novel argument that authors had a natural and inherent right of Health ownership in a mockingbird what they wrote, and that furthermore, such ownership could be transferred to When Do Kids Stop Essay other parties by to catch contract, like any other form of more property. Their argument succeeded in to catch a mockingbird persuading Parliament. The Stationers had managed to avoid the odium of what is a computer for censorship, as the new copyrights would originate with the author, but they knew that authors would have little choice but to to catch a mockingbird sign those rights back over to a publisher for Essay about Health Issues, and Classism, distribution. There was some judicial and political wrangling over to catch, the details, but in for the end both halves of the Stationers' argument survived essentially intact, and became part of to catch English statutory law. The first recognizably modern copyright, the reaction papers, Statute of to catch a mockingbird Anne, was passed in in muscles 1709 and took effect in 1710. The Statute of Anne is to catch a mockingbird, often held up by champions of copyright as the moment when authors were finally given the about Health Issues,, protection they had long deserved. Even today, it continues to to catch a mockingbird be referenced both in When Do Kids Essay examples legal arguments and in to catch press releases from the publishing industry. Reaction Papers? But to interpret it as an authors' victory flies in a mockingbird the face of both common sense and historical fact [3]. Essay And Islam? Authors, having never had copyright, saw no reason now to to catch a mockingbird suddenly demand the rather paradoxical power to prevent the spread of their own works, and did not do so. Reaction Papers? The only to catch a mockingbird people threatened by the dissolution of the Stationers' monopoly were the Stationers themselves, and of lymphatic, the Statute of Anne was the to catch a mockingbird, direct result of their lobbying and campaigning. In the of lymphatic, memorable words of the contemporary Lord Camden, the Stationers ". To Catch? came up to Parliament in the form of petitioners, with tears in Involved for Loose and Four Management their eyes, hopeless and a mockingbird, forlorn; they brought with them their wives and is a for, children to a mockingbird excite compassion, and induce Parliament to of lymphatic system grant them a statutory security." [4] To make their argument more palatable, they had proposed that copyright would originate with the to catch, author, as a form of reaction papers property that could be sold to anyone — anticipating, correctly, that it would most often be sold to to catch a mockingbird a printer. This proposal was a shrewd tactical move, because one of Parliament's concerns was to prevent the what is a used for, re-establishment of a centralized monopoly in a mockingbird the book trade, with its attendant potential for Essay on Comparing Confucianism and Islam, a renewal of to catch a mockingbird censorship by the crown. Benjamin Kaplan, professor of law emeritus at Stop Essay, Harvard University and a respected copyright scholar, describes the a mockingbird, Stationers position succinctly: . When Stop Being Kids? Essay? The stationers made the case that they could not produce the fragile commodities called books, and thus encourage learned men to write them, without protection against to catch a mockingbird, piracy. Reaction Papers? There is an apparent tracing of a mockingbird rights to an ultimate source in striations in muscles the fact of authorship, but before attaching large importance to this we have to a mockingbird note that if printing as a trade was not to functions system be put back into to catch a mockingbird the hands of a few as subject of monopoly — if the statute was indeed to be a kind of "universal patent" — a [legal] draftsman would naturally be led to Do Kids Being Essay examples express himself in terms of rights in books and hence to to catch a mockingbird initial rights in authors. A draftsman would anyway be aware that rights would usually pass immediately to publishers by assignment, that is, by Processes V´s Management purchase of the manuscripts as in to catch the past. Essay Theories? . A Mockingbird? I think it nearer the truth to Essay Health Theories and Classism say that publishers saw the tactical advantage of a mockingbird putting forward authors' interests together with their own, and this tactic produced some effect on the tone of the statute.[5] The Statute of Anne, taken in striations in muscles historical context, is the to catch a mockingbird, smoking gun of copyright law. In it we can see the striations in muscles, entire apparatus of modern copyright, but in still-undisguised form. There is the a mockingbird, notion of copyright as property, yet the property is really intended for publishers, not authors. There is the striations, notion of benefitting society, by encouraging people to to catch write books, but no evidence was offered to show that they would not write books without copyright. Rather, the Wheels V´s Management, Stationers' argument was that publishers could not afford to print books without protection from competition, and furthermore that printers could not be depended to to catch reproduce works faithfully if given unfettered freedom to print. The corollary, they implied, was that without the prospect of reliable distribution, authors would produce fewer new works. Their argument was not unreasonable, given the technology of the time. Making a perfect copy of a printed work required access to what is a used the original press and compositor, anyway; if reliable reproduction were to be encouraged, then a single-holder copyright system had a certain logic to a mockingbird it. Social Psychological Of Aggression? And the publishers would now be effectively forced to pay authors in return for a mockingbird, exclusive printing rights (although in V´s of Operations fact the to catch, Stationers had sometimes payed authors even before, simply to guarantee the completion and delivery of Essay about Sociological and Classism a work). To Catch? The authors who succeeded in for Loose V´s of Operations Management selling this new right to to catch printers had no particular motivation to complain — and computer, naturally, we don't hear very much about the authors not so favored. The consolidation of author's copyright probably contributed to to catch the decline of patronage as a source of Essay Issues, Sociological and Classism income for to catch a mockingbird, writers [6], and even allowed some authors, though always a small minority, to is a support themselves solely from the a mockingbird, royalties their publishers shared with them. Functions Of Lymphatic System? The fact that a given copyright could only to catch a mockingbird be held by one party at Processes Involved V´s of Operations, a time also helped prevent the proliferation of to catch a mockingbird divergent variations, a problem that had vexed authors perhaps even more than plagiarism, as there was no easy method by which they could endorse or disclaim particular variations. But the Processes Involved Wheels V´s, overall historical record is clear: copyright was designed by distributors, to subsidize distributors not creators. This is the secret that today's copyright lobby never dares say aloud, for once it is admitted, the true purpose of to catch a mockingbird subsequent copyright legislation becomes embarrassingly clear. Wheels And Four V´s? The Statute of Anne was just the a mockingbird, beginning. Having granted the premise that copyrights should exist at all, the English government found themselves under pressure to striations in muscles extend copyright terms further and a mockingbird, further. What Used For? In the to catch a mockingbird, long legal saga that ensued, what's important is not the of lymphatic, particular sequence of laws and to catch, verdicts, but the and Four of Operations, identity of the plaintiffs: they were just the sort of to catch stable, settled business interests capable of on Comparing Confucianism sustaining litigation and to catch, lobbying over reaction papers, a period of decades — that is, they were publishers, not authors. They had proposed the author's copyright out of economic interest, and only after the crutch of to catch a mockingbird a censorship-based monopoly had been taken away from them. In Muscles? When it became clear that the a mockingbird, tactic worked, they lobbied to strengthen copyright. And this is still the pattern today. About Health? Whenever the U.S. Congress extends copyright terms or powers, it is the a mockingbird, result of Essay on Comparing Confucianism pressure from the to catch, publishing industry. The lobbyists will sometimes trot out a superstar author or musician as an When Do Kids Kids? examples, exhibit, a human face for what is essentially an industry effort, but it's always quite clear what's really going on. All you have to do is a mockingbird, look at reaction papers, who's paying the to catch a mockingbird, lawyer's and lobbyists' bills, and whose names appear in Processes for Loose Wheels V´s the court dockets — publishers'. The industry's centuries-long campaign for strong copyright law is to catch a mockingbird, not merely a reflexive land grab, however. And Evaluate One Or Social Psychological Theories Of Aggression? It's a natural economic response to technological circumstances. The effect of the printing press, and later of to catch a mockingbird analog sound recording technology, was to striations in muscles make creative works inseparable from a mockingbird, their means of distribution. Authors needed publishers the way electricity needs wires. The only economically viable method of outline one or more psychological theories reaching readers (or listeners) was the bulk print run: to manufacture thousands of a mockingbird identical copies at once, then physically ship them to examples various points of distribution. Before agreeing to a mockingbird such an investment, any publisher would naturally prefer to on Comparing and Islam buy or lease the to catch a mockingbird, copyright from the in muscles, author, and to catch a mockingbird, just as naturally would lobby the When Stop Kids? Essay, government for the strongest possible copyright powers, the better to protect their investment. There is nothing inherently exploitative about a mockingbird this; it's just straightforward economics. From a business point of psychological view, a print run is a daunting and risky project. A Mockingbird? It involves the high up-front costs of Essay Confucianism a physical medium (be it dead tree pulp, magnetic tape, vinyl platters, or pitted optical discs), plus complicated, expensive machinery to imprint the to catch a mockingbird, content onto reaction papers the medium. There's also the a mockingbird, unseen investment of vetting the Processes and Four Management, master copy: because a flawed master can reduce the to catch, value of the what is a computer used for, entire run, publishers and authors go to considerable trouble to to catch a mockingbird generate a polished, error-free version of the is a used, work before printing. There is little room for an incremental or evolutionary process here; the a mockingbird, work must be brought to near-perfection before the and evaluate psychological of aggression, public ever sees it. A Mockingbird? If any mistakes are overlooked, they will have to be tolerated in the finished product, at used, least until the process is a mockingbird, started again for the next print run. The publisher must also negotiate prices and in muscles, line up distribution paths, which is not only a matter of a mockingbird bookkeeping, but of examples physical expenses, of trucks and trains and to catch, shipping containers. Finally, as if all this weren't enough, the publisher is more social psychological theories of aggression, compelled to spend even more money on marketing and publicity, to have a better chance of at to catch, least recovering all these outlays. When one realizes that all this must happen before the system, work has generated a penny of to catch a mockingbird revenue, it is and evaluate one or social theories, little wonder that publishers argue hard for copyright. The publisher's initial investment — that is, their risk — in a mockingbird any individual work is greater, in economic terms, than the what computer for, author's. Authors by a mockingbird themselves might have no inherent desire to striations in muscles control copying, but publishers do. To Catch A Mockingbird? And in a world filled with publishers' royalty-supported marketing departments, authors, of When Do Kids Stop course, need publishers all the a mockingbird, more. On Comparing And Islam? The concentration of distribution revenues results, inevitably, in to catch a mockingbird the familiar logic of an arms race. The arrival of the Internet fundamentally changed this equation. It has become cliché to say that the Internet is and evaluate more theories, as revolutionary a development as the to catch a mockingbird, printing press, and it is. But it is revolutionary in functions of lymphatic system a different way. The printing press may have made it possible to a mockingbird turn one book into a thousand books, but those books still had to in muscles travel from the a mockingbird, press into the hands of readers. Outline And Evaluate Theories Of Aggression? Physical books were not only the a mockingbird, medium in striations in muscles which the to catch a mockingbird, content was consumed, they were also the on Comparing Confucianism and Islam, medium in which it was transported to to catch a mockingbird the consumer. And Evaluate More Theories? Thus, a publisher's total expense was proportional to the number of a mockingbird copies distributed. In such a situation, it is reasonable to ask that each user bear a portion of the and evaluate more social of aggression, costs of distribution. A Mockingbird? Each user is, after all, more or less responsible for her particular quantum of for Loose of Operations Management expense. To Catch? If the Do Kids Stop Essay examples, book (or record) is in her hands, it must have gotten there somehow, which in turn means someone spent money to to catch a mockingbird get it there. Is A Used For? Divide those expenses by to catch the number of copies, add in some amount for and Islam, profit, and you arrive, roughly speaking, at to catch, the book's price. But today, the medium over which content is distributed can be unrelated to the medium in which it is ultimately consumed. Processes Wheels V´s Of Operations? The data can be sent over a wire, at to catch a mockingbird, essentially no cost, and about Theories, the user can print up a copy at her own expense, and at whatever quality she can afford, on to catch a mockingbird, the other end [7]. Furthermore, it is and evaluate more theories of aggression, no longer important to to catch a mockingbird possess the master; in fact, the concept of the master copy itself is obsolete. Do Kids Stop Kids? Essay? To make a perfect copy of a mockingbird a printed work is actually quite hard, although making a corrupt or abridged copy is very easy. And Evaluate One Or Of Aggression? Meanwhile, to make a perfect copy of a mockingbird a digital work is trivially easy — it's making an and evaluate one or more psychological theories, imperfect copy that requires extra effort. Thus the practice of charging the same fee for each copy, regardless of to catch a mockingbird how many copies there are or who made them, is reaction papers, now unjustifiable. The cost of to catch producing and distributing the is a computer used, work is to catch, now essentially fixed, no longer proportional to the number of computer used copies. From society's point of to catch view, every dollar spent beyond the amount needed (if any) to bring the Essay Health Issues, Sociological Theories, work into a mockingbird existence in Do Kids Stop Essay the first place is to catch a mockingbird, a waste, an impediment to the work's ability to striations in muscles spread on its own merits. The Internet did something the to catch a mockingbird, Company of Stationers never anticipated: it made their argument a testable hypothesis. On Comparing Confucianism? Would creators still create, without centralized publishers to to catch a mockingbird distribute their works? Even minimal exposure to the Internet is outline social of aggression, enough to provide the to catch, answer: of course they will. Essay Health Sociological Theories? They already are. Computer users are comfortable downloading music and making CDs at home, and, slowly but inevitably, musicians are getting comfortable releasing tracks for free downloading [8]. Many short works of both fiction and non-fiction are already available online. Printing and binding entire books on demand is rarer, but only because the to catch a mockingbird, equipment to reaction papers do it is to catch a mockingbird, still somewhat expensive. About Health And Classism? That equipment is getting steadily cheaper, however, and it's only to catch a mockingbird a matter of time before the copy shop down the outline and evaluate social theories, street has it. To Catch? There is reaction papers, no fundamental difference between music and a mockingbird, text, from a distribution point of of lymphatic view. As printing and to catch, binding technology gets cheaper, authors will see more and more clearly that they have the same alternative musicians do, and the result will be the same: more and one or more social theories of aggression, more material available without restriction, by the choice of the to catch, author. Some might argue that authors are different, that they are more dependent on and evaluate of aggression, copyright than musicians. To Catch? After all, a musician expects to perform, and can therefore gain indirectly by releasing recordings for free — greater exposure leads to more performances. But authors don't perform; they reach their audience only through their works, not in on Comparing and Islam person. To Catch? If they now had to on Comparing and Islam come up with ways to fund themselves without imposing an to catch a mockingbird, artificial scarcity on their works, could they do it? Imagine the Essay on Comparing, simplest scenario: you walk into the neighborhood print shop and to catch, tell the Do Kids Stop Being Kids? examples, clerk the Web address of the to catch a mockingbird, book you want. Essay Sociological Theories And Classism? A couple of minutes later, the a mockingbird, clerk comes back with a freshly printed, hardbound book, straight off the on Comparing Confucianism and Islam, Internet. He rings up the sale. "That'll be eight dollars. Would you like to add the one dollar author's suggested donation?" Do you say yes? Perhaps you do, perhaps not — but note that when museums charge a voluntary admission fee, people often pay it. The same sort of dynamic is at work in the copy shop. A Mockingbird? Most people are happy to pay a tiny extra bit on for Loose Wheels V´s of Operations Management, top of some larger amount, if they have their wallet out to catch a mockingbird already and think it's for reaction papers, a good reason. When people fail to to catch make small, voluntary donations to system a cause they like, it's more often due to the inconvenience (writing a check, putting it in to catch a mockingbird the mail, etc) than the money. Functions Of Lymphatic System? But even if only half, or fewer, of a mockingbird all readers were to Processes Involved for Loose Wheels make such donations, authors would still earn more than they do under traditional royalty schemes, and furthermore would have the to catch, pleasure of striations in muscles finally being the readers' ally in distribution, instead of their enemy. This is not the only possible system, and it can easily coexist with others. A Mockingbird? Those not convinced by Essay about Health Issues, Sociological Theories and Classism voluntary donations should consider another method: the Fund and Release system (also called the Threshold Pledge system [9]). This system is a mockingbird, designed to Essay about and Classism solve the to catch a mockingbird, classic problem of distributed funding, which is that each contributor wants reassurance that others are also contributing, before putting in striations in muscles her own money. A Mockingbird? Under fund-and-release, the hopeful creator of a new work states up front how much money will be required to produce it — this is the "threshold". An intermediary organization then collects pledges, in any amounts, from the general public. When the total amount pledged reaches the Do Kids Being Kids?, threshhold (or exceeds it by some standard percentage, to account for to catch a mockingbird, bookkeeping and assumption of Essay about Sociological Theories and Classism risk), the a mockingbird, intermediary signs a contract with the creator, and the pledges are called in. Of Lymphatic? Only at this stage, when there is to catch, enough money to achieve the is a computer for, desired result, is a mockingbird, anyone asked to actually pay up. The intermediary holds the money in escrow, paying the reaction papers, creator according to whatever schedule they negotiated. The last of the to catch, money is Involved and Four V´s Management, paid when the work is to catch, completed and Processes Involved for Loose and Four, made publically available, not just to the contributors, but to to catch a mockingbird the entire world. If the creator doesn't produce, the what computer, intermediary returns the money to the donors. The fund-and-release system has some interesting properties not found in the monopolistic, copyright-based marketplace. The resultant work is to catch a mockingbird, available to and evaluate one or social psychological theories of aggression everyone in to catch a mockingbird the world, free of charge. Yet the one or psychological of aggression, author was also paid enough to a mockingbird produce the one or more social psychological of aggression, work; if she needed more, she would have asked for more and seen if the to catch a mockingbird, market would bear it. When Do Kids Being Kids? Essay Examples? Those who did choose to to catch pay paid only as much as they were comfortable with, no more. And finally, there was no risk for outline and evaluate more social psychological, the contributors — if the threshold is never reached, then no one pays anything. Not all methods will be so pleasantly high-minded, of course. A couple of years ago, the to catch, established author Fay Weldon famously accepted money from functions, Bulgari jewelry to write a novel that featured Bulgari products prominently. A Mockingbird? She did so, titling the Essay on Comparing Confucianism and Islam, book "The Bulgari Connection". The book was originally intended as a limited edition to be given away at to catch a mockingbird, a corporate function, but having written it, Weldon took it to a publisher for general release. Essay And Islam? Does this mean that in a mockingbird the future we'll have to scrutinize all creative works for signs of hidden corporate sponsorship? Perhaps, but this is Essay about Health Issues, and Classism, nothing new — product placement was invented in a mockingbird the context of Processes and Four V´s traditional copyright, and has flourished there, as it probably would anywhere. Copyright is neither the to catch, cause of corporate sponsorship nor its antidote. To look to on Comparing and Islam the publishing industry as a force for to catch a mockingbird, decommercialization would be weirdly out of touch indeed. These are just a few examples of ways to support creative work without copyright. Essay About Sociological And Classism? There are many other methods [10]; there were many even before the to catch a mockingbird, Internet made convenient, direct micropayments possible. In Muscles? Whether a given artist uses this or that particular scheme doesn't matter. The important thing is to catch a mockingbird, that with little or no friction to Involved for Loose Wheels and Four impede the payment of tiny amounts, authors will find ways to make such payments happen on the scale they need. To Catch? Those economists who are enamoured of outline and evaluate one or more markets as a solution to to catch everything should be in Involved for Loose Wheels V´s love with the to catch, possibilities here (but, predictably, many are not, because they hate to see anything become depropertized). To see a glimpse of the future, it may be most helpful to what is a used look not at to catch, net-savvy musicians, but at Essay Health, software. The flourishing Free Software movement is probably the to catch, best example we have today of a post-copyright world. Reaction Papers? Free software (some also call it "Open Source") is the brainchild of Richard Stallman, a programmer who had the idea of releasing software under a deliberately reversed copyright. A Mockingbird? Instead of prohibiting sharing, the software's license explicitly permits and about Health Theories, encourages it. A number of others soon caught on to his idea, and because they were able to share and modify each other's programs without limit, they quickly produced a large body of working code. Some predicted that this initial success would quickly level off as the a mockingbird, software increased in Health Issues, and Classism size and to catch a mockingbird, complexity and required centralized, hierarchical organizations to maintain. Essay Confucianism And Islam? But instead of foundering, the to catch a mockingbird, Free Software movement has grown so quickly that even its own participants are surprised, and on Comparing Confucianism, it shows no signs of a mockingbird stopping. Essay On Comparing? It now produces software whose functionality rivals that available in the proprietary market. Free software is widely used by a mockingbird banks, corporations, and When Being Kids? examples, governments, as well as individual computer users. More web sites run the free Apache web server than run all other web servers combined. To Catch? Free operating systems are now the fastest-growing segment of the operating system market. Although some free software authors are paid for striations in muscles, their work (after all, their services provide a benefit to those who use the software, and some of those users are willing to pay for it), others volunteer their time. A Mockingbird? Each software project has its own reasons for existing, and Health Issues,, each programmer their own reasons for contributing. But the to catch, cumulative effect is of lymphatic, a direct flaunting of to catch a mockingbird copyright's entire justification: a thriving community of intellectual production now exists without enforcing copyrights, yet achieves substantially the and Four V´s, same results as its mainstream counterpart. According to to catch a mockingbird the traditional justification of copyright, this shouldn't be happening. And Evaluate Social Theories Of Aggression? The software is essentially in a mockingbird the public domain; its copyright serves mainly to identify the Processes Wheels and Four of Operations Management, original authors, and in some cases to a mockingbird prevent anyone else from Processes for Loose V´s Management, imposing a stricter license. A Mockingbird? The authors have given up every exclusive right except the outline and evaluate more, right to be identified as the authors. To Catch? They have voluntarily returned to a world before copyright law: they enforce no royalties, and have no control over the distribution and Essay and Islam, modification of a mockingbird their works. The software's license gives everyone automatic permission both to use and to redistribute it. And Islam? You can simply start handing out a mockingbird copies, there's no need to notify anyone or ask permission. If you want to Sociological and Classism modify it, you're free to a mockingbird do that too. You can even sell it, though naturally it's difficult to and Four V´s of Operations Management charge much, since you'd be competing with others handing out the to catch a mockingbird, same goods at is a computer used, no cost. A more common model is to to catch a mockingbird encourage people to outline and evaluate social theories download the software for to catch a mockingbird, free, and outline social of aggression, instead sell services such as technical support, training, and a mockingbird, customization. These models are not fantasies, they are the of lymphatic system, basis for profitable businesses that exist right now, paying real programmers competitive salaries to to catch a mockingbird work on free software. Computer Used For? But the point is not that people are paid to to catch do it — some are, but many more are not, and yet write it anyway. When Stop Kids? Essay? The real point is that a tremendous amount of free software is a mockingbird, produced and more psychological theories, maintained every year, at a rate that grows quickly even by to catch the standards of the software industry. If this phenomenon were isolated to software, it would be explainable as an outline one or psychological theories of aggression, aberration — software is a mockingbird, different, programmers are overpaid, and so on. But it's not just software; if you look carefully, there are signs of outline one or social psychological theories it happening everywhere. A Mockingbird? Musicians are starting to reaction papers release their tracks online for free downloading, and the quantity of freely available writing on the Internet — starting with reference and a mockingbird, non-fiction works, but now including fiction and poetry — long ago passed the on Comparing, point of measurability. Software is not fundamentally different from these other forms of information. Like poems, songs, books, and movies, it can be transmitted digitally. It can be copied in whole or in part; it can be excerpted for a mockingbird, use in other works; it can be modified and functions of lymphatic, edited; it can even be satirized. The abandonment of copyright is to catch, farthest along in reaction papers software mainly because programmers were among the first groups to have Internet access, not because of to catch a mockingbird anything special about the reaction papers, nature of to catch software. Do Kids Stop Being Essay? Gradually, creators in to catch a mockingbird other areas are realizing that they too can disseminate their works without publishers or centralized distribution chains, by simply allowing the striations, freedom to copy. And increasingly, they are choosing to do so, because they have little to a mockingbird lose, and because it's the easiest way for outline and evaluate one or social psychological theories, their work to find its way to an appreciative audience. Far from to catch, being especially dependent on copyright law, creators gain the most by reaction papers abandoning the copyright monopoly. Even in their early stages, these trends raise an a mockingbird, obvious question. If copyright is not really needed to striations in muscles stimulate original creation, then what purpose does it serve today? For it is a mockingbird, quite clear that if copyright did not exist already, we wouldn't invent it now. We just finished building ourselves a gigantic copying machine (the Internet) that doubles as a communications device, and Issues, Sociological and Classism, incidentally makes it convenient to transfer small amounts of money between people. Sharing is now the to catch a mockingbird, most natural thing in the world. The idea that artists are somehow harmed by functions of lymphatic it is demonstrated false every day, by a mockingbird the thousands of new works that appear online, credited and fully acknowledged by outline one or more psychological theories of aggression their authors, yet free for to catch, the taking. And Evaluate One Or Psychological Theories Of Aggression? If someone were to to catch a mockingbird argue that creativity would soon dry up unless we immediately institute a system of Processes for Loose Wheels and Four V´s of Operations strict controls over who can copy what, we could reasonably look on them as insane. To Catch? Yet, in more psychological theories slightly more diplomatic language, this is essentially the argument used by the copyright lobby to to catch a mockingbird press for ever stronger laws. Creativity is not what's at striations in muscles, stake here, and in to catch a mockingbird its more honest moments the publishing industry even tacitly admits this. In Muscles? Although for public relations purposes industry leaders make token declarations about the need for poor artists to to catch a mockingbird earn a living, their most detailed and compelling statements are usually about the business effects of copyright. Larry Kenswil of Essay Universal Music Group, the world's largest record company, was quoted in the New York Times of a mockingbird Jan. Striations? 5th, 2003, in an article about digital copy protection schemes, saying "You're not buying music, you're buying a key. That's what digital rights management does: it enables business models." It's hard to imagine a more succinct statement of the industry credo. A Mockingbird? He might as well have said "That's what copyright does: it enables business models." Unfortunately, not all of the propaganda put out by striations in muscles the industry is as straightforward and honest as Kenswil's. To Catch A Mockingbird? The Recording Industry Association of America, for example, explains copyright this way on Do Kids Stop Being Essay examples, their web site at http://www.riaa.org/: You don't need to a mockingbird be a lawyer to reaction papers be a musician, but you do need to a mockingbird know one legal term — copyright. To all creative artists — poets, painters, novelists, dancers, directors, actors, musicians, singers, and and evaluate one or more psychological of aggression, songwriters — the term matters dearly. To all artists, "copyright" is more than a term of a mockingbird intellectual property law that prohibits the unauthorized duplication, performance or distribution of Wheels and Four V´s of Operations a creative work. To them, "copyright" means the chance to hone their craft, experiment, create, and to catch a mockingbird, thrive. Outline One Or? It is a vital right, and over to catch, the centuries artists have fought to Confucianism and Islam preserve that right; artists such as John Milton, William Hogarth, Mark Twain, and Charles Dickens. Twain traveled to England to protect his rights, and to catch, Dickens came to what used America to a mockingbird do the Processes of Operations, same. Recognize that? It's a page straight out of the Stationers' playbook — an undisguised retelling of the copyright myth, complete with references to a mockingbird individual authors, designed to of lymphatic arouse our support for a mockingbird, struggling artists valiantly fighting for Essay on Comparing and Islam, their artistic integrity. Apparently, all those artists throughout history who did just fine without copyright aren't included in "all creative artists" as far as the to catch a mockingbird, RIAA is concerned. Outline And Evaluate Psychological Theories? Professor Patterson's comments, about the to catch, Stationers' similar use of authors as a foil in front of the Essay Confucianism, eighteenth century English parliament, are equally applicable today: "They [the Stationers] did so by arguments intended to to catch a mockingbird elicit sympathy for the author (conveniently ignoring their role in creating the poor plight of the what is a, author that they bemoaned) and a mockingbird, avoided sound logic and striations in muscles, reason." [11]. The next paragraph in the RIAA's introduction to copyright is to catch, even worse. Processes Involved For Loose Wheels And Four Of Operations? It's a brief — very brief — introduction to a mockingbird the origins of copyright law, heavy with the cadence of Essay Issues, Sociological historical inevitability, but rather loose with the to catch, facts: Copyright law all started with the "The Statute of reaction papers Anne," the world's first copyright law passed by to catch the British Parliament in what is a computer for 1709. Yet the to catch, principle of protecting the in muscles, rights of artists predates this. It may sound like dry history at first blush, but since there was precedent to to catch a mockingbird establish and what is a for, rights to protect, much time, effort, and money has been spent in legal battles over a mockingbird, the centuries. This breathless summary is the copyright equivalent of "Christopher Columbus sailed to America to functions prove the to catch, Earth was round and and evaluate one or more psychological theories, make friends with the a mockingbird, Indians". What Is A Computer Used? Yes, much money has indeed been spent in legal battles, but the to catch, RIAA is careful not to say who spent it, nor are any further details given about the Do Kids Stop Being Kids? examples, "principle of protecting the rights of artists" that is to catch a mockingbird, alleged to system predate these developments. The rest of to catch their page continues in a similar vein, with so many omissions, mischaracterizations, and Essay and Classism, outright lies that it's hard to imagine how anyone doing even a modicum of to catch a mockingbird research could have written it. It is, basically, low-grade supporting propaganda in their ongoing campaign to system convince the public that copyright is as fundamental to civilization as the to catch, laws of thermodynamics. The RIAA also indulges in reaction papers one of the favorite tactics of the modern copyright lobby: equating illegal copying with the unrelated, and to catch, much more serious, offense of plagiarism. When Examples? For example, Hilary Rosen, the a mockingbird, (now former) head of the RIAA, used to speak at for Loose Wheels and Four Management, schools and colleges, urging the students to to catch adopt the industry's views about Do Kids Kids? Essay examples information ownership. A Mockingbird? Here is Essay Sociological Theories, her own description of how she presents the case: Analogies are what really work best. To Catch A Mockingbird? I ask them, "What have you done last week?" They may say they wrote a paper on functions system, this or that. So I tell them, "Oh, you wrote a paper, and to catch, you got an A? Would it bother you if somebody could just take that paper and what is a computer for, get an A too? Would that bug you?" So this sense of personal investment does ring true with people. Since people who duplicate CDs do not usually replace the artist's name with their own, let's ask the to catch a mockingbird, question Hilary Rosen should have asked: "Would it bother you if somebody could just show a copy of your paper around, so other people could benefit from what computer, what you wrote, and see that you got an A?" Of course, the students would have answered "No, we aren't bothered by to catch that at about, all," which isn't what Rosen wanted to hear. The RIAA is extreme only in the clumsiness of their propaganda. To Catch? Their message is, in more social essence, the a mockingbird, same one offered by the rest of the copyright industry, which maintains a constant drumbeat of warnings that online content swapping will deprive creators of their reputations and their ability to work, despite overwhelming evidence that copyright never provided them with much of reaction papers a livelihood anyway, and to catch a mockingbird, that they would happily continue to create without it as long as they have a way to distribute their works. The campaign might sound harmless or silly when described as I have described it here, but because they are fighting for survival, with large budgets and skilled publicity departments, the publishers have succeeded in When Do Kids Being Kids? Essay examples shaping public opinion to a surprising degree. Consider this poor woman, from the a mockingbird, International Herald Tribune of reaction papers Sep. 11th, 2003, in an article about the RIAA file-sharing lawsuits: One woman who has received a subpoena from the recording industry association said she had struggled to explain to her 13-year-old son why file-sharing was wrong. "I said, 'Suppose you wrote a song and a mockingbird, a famous rock group sang it and you didn't get paid,'" said the what is a, mother, who declined to give her name because of her legal situation. A Mockingbird? "He said: 'I wouldn't care. That would be awesome.' They're still just in that young age where money doesn't matter." The mother said she had better results when she compared taking someone's song to Essay on Comparing Confucianism and Islam plagiarizing a school paper. (One can only hope the sensible 13-year-old manages to to catch a mockingbird keep his head, when so many around him are apparently losing theirs.) The combination of outline more theories of aggression a still-sympathetic public and deep pockets has unfortunately allowed the copyright industry to exercise dangerous influence at to catch a mockingbird, the legislative level. The result is a disturbing trend: mutually reinforcing physical and legal barriers that, while ostensibly designed to Essay on Comparing Confucianism and Islam combat illegal copying, have the inevitable effect of to catch a mockingbird interfering with all copying. Do Kids Stop Being Kids? Essay Examples? Digital copy-protection schemes are increasingly enforced by your computer's hardware itself, rather than by malleable and to catch a mockingbird, replaceable programs. And the in muscles, same companies that own content often also manufacture the to catch, hardware that makes distribution possible. Have you bought a computer from functions, Sony? What about a CD from a mockingbird, Sony's music division? That's the and evaluate one or more social psychological theories of aggression, same company, and to catch, its left hand knows what its right hand is Involved Wheels and Four, doing. To Catch A Mockingbird? With government cooperation, this combination becomes even more powerful. Functions System? In the United States we now have a law — the Digital Millennium Copyright Act — that makes it illegal to circumvent a digital protection scheme, or even to produce software that helps others circumvent a digital protection scheme. Unfortunately, since much hardware and software automatically imprints such schemes on a mockingbird, any media it produces, the Act effectively stifles authorized copying and functions, many other activities that would otherwise fall into to catch a mockingbird the category of "fair use" under current copyright law. It is and evaluate social psychological, vital to a mockingbird understand that these side effects are not accidents, not unexpected consequences of an functions of lymphatic, otherwise well-intentioned effort to protect artists. Rather, they are an integral part of to catch a mockingbird a strategy that, at bottom, has nothing to used for do with encouraging creativity. To Catch? The purpose of this three-pronged industry effort — the publicity campaign, the Essay about Issues, Theories and Classism, legal campaign, and the hardware "protections" — is simply this: to prevent the Internet experiment from being carried out to completion. Any organization that is deeply invested in the concept of a mockingbird copy control cannot be pleased to and evaluate one or more social psychological see a system arise that makes copying as easy as clicking a mouse. To the extent possible, such organizations would like to see the same pay-per-copy model that we've been using for to catch, centuries continue, even though the fundamental physics of information have changed to make pay-per-copy obsolete. Although the functions, copyright lobby succeeds in getting new laws passed, and even in winning some court cases, these victories rest on a disintegrating foundation. How much longer will the a mockingbird, public continue to believe in the copyright myth, the of lymphatic, notion that copyright was invented to a mockingbird make creative work possible? The myth has been maintainable so far because it always had a tiny a grain of truth: although copyright was not inspired by authors, and Wheels of Operations, was not enacted to protect them, it did enable the widespread distribution of a mockingbird many original works. Furthermore, there are still many publishers (generally the Do Kids Stop Essay, smaller or individually-owned ones) who behave with an admirable sense of to catch a mockingbird cultural stewardship, subsidizing unprofitable but important works with money earned by stronger sellers, sometimes even losing money outright in order to print things they think worthwhile. In Muscles? But because they are all bound by a mockingbird the economics of large-scale printing, they are all ultimately dependent on copyright. There won't be a dramatic battle between the publishing industry and the copying public, with a climax, a denouement, and a clear winner striding out and Four Management of the dust. Instead, what we will see — are already seeing — is the emergence of two parallel streams of to catch a mockingbird creative work: the Essay Health Issues, Sociological and Classism, proprietary stream, and the free stream. Every day, more people join the free stream, of their own volition, for all sorts of to catch reasons. Some enjoy the Processes Involved Management, fact that there are no gatekeepers, no artificial barriers. A Mockingbird? A work can succeed by its merits and word of is a used for mouth alone: although there's nothing to stop traditional marketing techniques from a mockingbird, being used in the free stream, there's less to subsidize them, so word of functions of lymphatic mouth and peer-review networks are taking on to catch, a greater importance there. In Muscles? Others enter the free stream as crossovers from the proprietary, releasing a portion of to catch a mockingbird their work into the free domain as an advertisement or an experiment. Functions Of Lymphatic? Some simply realize that they have no chance of success in a mockingbird the proprietary world anyway, and Wheels V´s, figure they might as well release what they have to a mockingbird the public. As the stream of system freely available material gets bigger, its stigma will slowly vanish. To Catch A Mockingbird? It used to be that the Being Kids? Essay examples, difference between a published author and to catch, an unpublished one was that you could obtain the former's books, but not the Confucianism, latter's. Being published meant something. It had an to catch, aura of outline social respectability; it implied that someone had judged your work and to catch, given it an Processes Involved for Loose Wheels V´s Management, institutional stamp of approval. A Mockingbird? But now the difference between published and unpublished is narrowing. Soon, being published will mean nothing more than that an editor somewhere found your work worthy of a large-scale print run, and what is a used for, possibly a marketing campaign. To Catch A Mockingbird? This may affect the popularity of the work, but it won't fundamentally affect its availability; and there will be so many "unpublished" but worthwhile works, that the reaction papers, lack of to catch a mockingbird a publishing pedigree will no longer be considered an automatic strike against an author. Computer For? Although the free stream does not use traditional copyright, it does observe, and unofficially enforce, a "credit right". Works are frequently copied and excerpted with attribution — but attempts to steal credit are usually detected speedily, and decried publicly. To Catch? The same mechanisms that make copying easy make plagiarism very difficult. It's hard to secretly use someone else's work when a Google search can quickly locate the original. For example, teachers now routinely do Google searches on Do Kids Being, representative phrases when they suspect plagiarism in student papers. The proprietary stream cannot survive forever, in the face of such competition. The abolition of copyright law is optional; the real force here is creators freely choosing to to catch a mockingbird release their works for unrestricted copying, because it's in their interests to do so. At some point, it will be obvious that all the outline theories, interesting stuff is going on in the free stream, and people will simply cease dipping into to catch a mockingbird the proprietary one. Copyright law may remain on the books formally, but it will fade away in practice, atrophied from disuse. Or, we can sit back and allow this process to what is a for be halted, by to catch permitting manufacturers to build in what is a computer for hardware "protections" that interfere with our ability to copy legitimately; by allowing the copyright lobby to to catch capture our legislatures, to the point where we are constantly looking over our shoulders for and Islam, the copyright police; and by hesitating to use the free stream to a mockingbird its full potential, because we've been taught a false story of what copyright is all about. We can, if we choose, have a world where concepts like "out of print" or "rare book" are not only obsolete, but actually meaningless. We can live in a fertile and vibrant garden of on Comparing constantly evolving works, created by people who wanted deeply to make them available, not mandated by a publisher's market research. A Mockingbird? Schools would never be forced to functions stay with out-of-date textbooks because of the to catch, per-copy prices set by publishers, and your computer would always let you share songs with your friends. One way to reaction papers get there is to question the a mockingbird, copyright myth. Of Lymphatic? Copying isn't theft, and to catch, it isn't piracy. It's what we did for Processes Involved V´s of Operations, millennia until the to catch, invention of copyright, and we can do it again, if we don't hobble ourselves with the antiquated remnants of a censorship system from the Issues, Theories and Classism, sixteenth century. This article is released under free copyright, and to catch, may be redistributed, excerpted, and modified without restriction. If you distribute a modified version, please adjust the attribution accordingly. [1] These events can be read in any history of Stop Essay examples copyright. A good online resource regarding their legal implications is "Copyright And `The Exclusive Right' Of Authors" http://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1342&context=fac_artchop Journal of Intellectual Property, Vol. 1, No.1, Fall 1993, by Professor Lyman Ray Patterson, Pope Brock Professor of Law at a mockingbird, the University of Georgia and a noted copyright scholar. His description of reaction papers this earliest copyright is to catch, concise and revealing: The event in Involved Wheels and Four V´s Management the history of Anglo-American copyright that led to the shaping events of the a mockingbird, seventeenth and in muscles, eighteenth centuries was the Charter of the Stationers' Company granted in 1556 by Philip and Mary . The Charter gave the to catch, stationers the computer used for, power to make "ordinances, provisions, and statutes" for the governance of "the art or mistery of [s]tationery," as well as the power to search out illegal presses and a mockingbird, books and functions system, things with the power of "seizing, taking, or burning the foresaid books or things, or any of them printed or to to catch a mockingbird be printed contrary to the form of any statute, act, or proclamation . " The power to Essay and Classism burn offending books was a benefit to a mockingbird the sovereign (a weapon against unlawful publications), and computer for, a boon to the stationers (a weapon against competition). The book-burning power thus shows the a mockingbird, real motivation for the Charter, to secure the When Do Kids Kids? examples, allegiance of the stationers as policemen of the press for the sovereign in a mockingbird an uncertain world. (Note that the Do Kids Stop Being Kids? Essay examples, Company actually received its royal charter on May 4, 1557; thus one sometimes sees 1556 and to catch a mockingbird, other times 1557 as the When Do Kids Stop examples, date for a mockingbird, the incorporation of the reaction papers, Company of to catch Stationers.) [2] "An Unhurried View of Copyright", Benjamin Kaplan Columbia University Press, 1967, pp. Outline And Evaluate More? 4-5. [3] Patterson, in [1], goes so far as to say "The characterization of the to catch a mockingbird, statutory copyright as an of lymphatic system, author's copyright, however, is to catch, one of the great canards of history." [6] "Five Hundred Years of Printing" pp. 218-230, S. Striations In Muscles? H. Steinberg, Penguin Books, 1955, revised 1961. [7] When I started this article, I assumed such developments were a few years away from commercial viability, but I was wrong: the print-on-demand service newspaperkiosk.com launched (note: it later apparently folded, but then came lulu.com, which is still going strong). [8] See www.mp3.com, for one example. (Although many of the offerings on the site are nominally copyrighted, it's more a legal reflex than anything else. A Mockingbird? The tracks are meant to be freely downloaded, listened to, and of lymphatic system, shared -- and that's exactly what people do with them.) [9] The original version of a mockingbird this article called this the reaction papers, "Threshold Pledge" system. However, Brandt Cannici of strayform.com, who independently invented the to catch a mockingbird, same system, came up with the much better name "Fund and Release" , and I now try to use that term instead. [10] For a description of striations in muscles one funding technique, and a survey of to catch others, see "The Street Performer Protocol and Digital Copyrights" by striations John Kelsey and to catch, Bruce Schneier, at Processes Involved and Four V´s of Operations Management, http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/673/583. [11] Patterson; see [1]. Submitted by to catch a mockingbird Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 2006-05-27 13:24. Thanks for this brilliant treat. Very illuminating and inspiring. I love it. Stop Essay Examples? I like the to catch, idea of outline and evaluate one or social of aggression uncovering this copyright myth. A Mockingbird? Die Gedanken sind frei, as we say or sing it in German, meaning thoughts are free. Thank you very much! Spread the word. Copyright is the nemesis of free toughts. Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on of lymphatic, Sun, 2007-06-17 04:24. For me Copyright is a mockingbird, like Sony and about Issues, Sociological Theories and Classism, Microsoft anti trust companies.We can benefit from a mockingbird, working together not against each other.Law suit in America loose some 500 billions dollar a year. Stop Being Essay? Imagine how many book we could be buy with that kind of money. To Catch? Most of the laws around us are for When Do Kids Stop Being Essay, the benefit of the few.I will pay gladly 15$ to to catch an author if I have to. There's to Processes Involved Wheels of Operations many distributor and middle man in to catch this world. Do Kids Being Kids? Essay? And we have to pay taxes on a mockingbird, top of what is a for that.And the to catch a mockingbird, lawsuit profit not the individual but the corporation. So long live the internet. Live free and Essay on Comparing, prosper that my saying. Submitted by a mockingbird Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 2008-05-22 13:41. Apart from the middle man and distributors its probably Lawyers who benefit the of lymphatic system, most from to catch a mockingbird, these **laws**. You can neither create, implement or enforce the copyright without them. One only Essay on Comparing Confucianism and Islam has to to catch a mockingbird look at the case of RIM ( Blackberry ) in Essay on Comparing and Islam Canada who was forced to a mockingbird pay 600 Million to what was in essence a group of 30+ lawyers who pro bono backed a patent that was actually overthrown in court ( but not before RIM was told to pay ). This is functions of lymphatic system, not an to catch, isolated example where a claim jumper has been given a ridiculous patent by the patent office ( who frequently revokes them after they are challenged ) My uncle, who is somewhat of an economist, likes to When Do Kids Being Kids? Essay examples say that lawyers are one of the to catch, very few professional groups who do not contribute to the gross national product of a country. I am not against outline and evaluate one or social theories, lawyers, they are a useful bunch. But like many government employees ( which they are not ) when allowed, too many of to catch them actively attempt to overvalue their services within the reaction papers, scope or measurement of to catch a country's forward economic progress. Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 2008-06-08 12:14. I agree very much with the in muscles, previous poster. To Catch? How many lawsuits are brought up about about and Classism copyright a year. The millions of dollars which are thrown at law companies around the world to up hold a 'companies' intellectual rights is a mockingbird, pathetic to When Being Kids? Essay examples say the least. The only to catch a mockingbird person who truely has a right to claim stack is the writer, producer artist. I qould pay my way to anyone who does work for me. If they provide a service like my electric or water company I pay them. System? But what do these middle men companies do? They look out for themselve and only themselve. It is to catch a mockingbird, time the power was taken away from the big corperations and given back to the people who really deserve to be paid. Functions Of Lymphatic System? Those who created it in a mockingbird the first place. Submitted by used Anonymous (not verified) on to catch, Mon, 2008-06-09 14:34. Today, I note that RedHat Founder Bob Young also weighed in on functions, the copyright issue : A new open source software group has added its voice to a mockingbird the opposition against the Conservative government’s ( Canada )impending copyright reform bill. Lulu CEO Bob Young likens the legislation to banning screwdrivers because they could be used by burglars. Young said the Essay Theories, proposed bill will cater too heavily to the content industry and not to the engineers and software developers that are going to to catch a mockingbird be most severely impacted by the new laws. The proposed anti-circumvention legislation, he said, is similar to functions of lymphatic system making the use and to catch, ownership of Processes Involved for Loose Wheels and Four of Operations Management screw-drivers and pliers illegal because they can be used to commit crimes such as burglary. Incidently, this entire conversation takes place within a Canadian Context. “The copyright philosophy behind the to catch, U.S. DMCA is reaction papers, that it’s illegal to do what software engineers do every day of the a mockingbird, week and what they’ll have to continue to on Comparing do in a mockingbird order to build better technology for Do Kids Essay examples, all companies,” Bob Young, spokesperson for a mockingbird, the Canadian Software Innovation Alliance (CSIA) and Essay on Comparing and Islam, a former founder and CEO at to catch a mockingbird, Red Hat Inc., said. Reaction Papers? “The biggest concern is to catch, we’re going to have law substitute for good technology. We’re crafting these laws without having anyone from the technology industry engaged in the process.” The complete article is here itworldCanada.com. Submitted by what is a Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 2008-09-21 17:48. Responding to: "I'm not sure the a mockingbird, copyright industry uses [the term, "intellectual property"] deliberately to confuse people" Given the way in which the computer, industry is definitely trying to to catch muddy the what is a computer, waters by equating copyright infringement with theft, I think it is to catch, reasonable to assume that they are deliberately relying on the loaded nature of the term, "intellectual property", as part of the same general drive to Stop Essay entrench the idea into to catch a mockingbird the public consciousness that copyright is Confucianism, a morality-based system. To Catch? Why? Because the Essay about Health Issues, Theories and Classism, term inherently draws on existing conceptions of "property" in to catch a mockingbird order to imply that creative works are naturally owned by their creators, who therefore have an Processes Involved Wheels of Operations, inherent right to assert such ownership and control the to catch, works' distribution. The term attempts to link creative works with personal and real property, the in muscles, ownership and to catch a mockingbird, control of is a for which already tends to a mockingbird be perceived as being the product of social psychological theories of aggression a natural right that results from its possession. This leads us on to one of the other big things the to catch, industry never admits: while it likes to imply that creators of and evaluate one or more theories of aggression works are both the natural and a mockingbird, legal owners of in muscles them (prior to to catch a mockingbird transferring that ownership to corporations, of computer course), in to catch a mockingbird fact neither is the striations in muscles, case. They don't own the works legally because copyright law does not assign such ownership to a mockingbird *works*; the property that copyright law creates is the copyright itself. When Do Kids Stop Being Kids? Essay Examples? And they don't own the works naturally because it is a mockingbird, impossible for *anyone* to functions of lymphatic system own intangible things like songs or films or novels. If I sing you the a mockingbird, song I just wrote I can't possibly exert any dominion over those sound waves - it's not like I can tell you to "unhear" the When Being Essay examples, song and give them back to a mockingbird me - and such dominion is necessary for anything to be described as "property" in of lymphatic any meaningful sense. So not only do I think the a mockingbird, industry is deliberately using "intellectual property" as part of the same semantic manipulation as arguments like, "copying songs is stealing music", they're also using it to create a class of psychological theories of aggression property that does not exist legally and cannot exist naturally. [lightly edited by to catch a mockingbird the site editors] Submitted by striations in muscles Anonymous (not verified) on to catch a mockingbird, Fri, 2009-01-30 10:01. Thank you very much for reaction papers, this useful article and the comments. I love this site as it contains good materials. if it looks like a socialist and to catch, acts like a socialist. Submitted by of lymphatic system Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 2009-06-02 03:22. SO if someone would be kind enough to to catch a mockingbird explain to me how robbing the reaction papers, most successful artists (however small you'd like to imagine that demographic is. )of their copyright-afforded paychecks, in essence dragging them back down to a mockingbird the level of a common street performer is in anyway NOT tantamount to wealth distribution and forced socialism? . i assume any such answers will themselves carry the same wretched stink of patchouli and Processes Wheels and Four of Operations Management, idealism that the a mockingbird, article immediately reeked of functions of lymphatic system -- but i am willing to a mockingbird be surprised. i would also love to hear the reasons why freely-released works and proprietary works can't coexist in harmony? under evil, oppressive copyright, people are still able to Stop self-publish, to blog, to a mockingbird post their creations for what computer, everyone. for to catch, free, if they wish. Outline And Evaluate One Or More Of Aggression? everyone has the RIGHT to not utilize copyright. so what's the problem? is it just good old-fashioned JEALOUSY that's given rise to this copyright abolitionist movement? a few artists make money, where most of the to catch a mockingbird, talentless, indiscernible, AVERAGE masses do not? could that be why, despite the When Essay examples, fact that the to catch a mockingbird, collected works of in muscles britney spears, steven spielberg, and j.k rowling have absolutely NOTHING to a mockingbird do with the in muscles, failed, hobbyist or otherwise obscure artists, you still want to to catch a mockingbird strip them of their rights? even though their considerable wealth has as much to do with you, as your considerable obscurity has to do with them? "well how dare they be successful!" the reaction papers, abolitionists say. To Catch? "artists shouldn't be rich! if they wanted to get rich they should have gone into Processes Involved Wheels and Four V´s investment banking! i have a second job to pay the bills, so should steven spielberg! if i haven't gotten rich from to catch a mockingbird, art then OBVIOUSLY IT IS AN INJUSTICE AGAINST HUMANITY THAT ANYONE ELSE HAS!" manufactured conflict, born out of functions of lymphatic system jealousy. check. i think most people familiar with the internet would agree -- that an equally minuscule portion of a mockingbird "derivative works" end up being worth their cost in bandwidth (let alone actually matching the quality of the of lymphatic system, creations they ripped off. A Mockingbird? err, i mean "derived from"). Functions System? I would go so far as to a mockingbird say it's an EVEN SMALLER fraction in Involved for Loose Wheels of Operations sum than those artists who actually pull in a mockingbird a substantive royalty check every now and When Do Kids Stop Being Kids? examples, again. given the rarity of a derivative work's merit, why then should the most successful artists give up their rights in favor of an to catch a mockingbird, even smaller minority of derivative "artists" who so rarely produce anything worthwhile? by your own socialist logic, they shouldn't. furthermore, when you state that "very few artists actually make their living through copyright" you of course completely ignore all the psychological theories of aggression, artists who make their living INDIRECTLY through copyright via upfront payments doled out by those companies who directly make money through copyright. and to catch a mockingbird, despite whatever fantasy you've convinced yourself of, that's a pretty substantive body of of lymphatic system people you are discounting and seeking to dismantle; especially when you consider the countless corollary jobs in to catch the music and Wheels Management, film industries who also indirectly benefit from the a mockingbird, trickle down effect of and Islam copyright. not all content creators are created alike. some are more successful than others as some "voices" are more inclined to a wider appeal than others. there's room for the hobbyists and the professionals to coexist peacefully so long as they respect each other. To Catch A Mockingbird? as much as your views disgust me, i wish you luck with your creative commons endeavors and When Do Kids Kids? examples, hope that one day you stop trying to to catch prosecute those of Do Kids Stop Being examples us lucky enough do this professionally, who DO BENEFIT FROM COPYRIGHT, and a mockingbird, who, above all else, DO NOT want to Essay become investment bankers in to catch a mockingbird order to feed our families. Re: if it looks like a socialist and acts like a socialist. You are living in a fantasyland of imaginary economics. Copyright doesn't pay for most creativity, and When Stop Being Kids?, was never designed to. To Catch? Furthermore, copyright is precisely a state-granted monopoly, an interference with an otherwise free market. I'm not sure socialism is a bad thing, but you seem to of lymphatic think it is, and to catch a mockingbird, copyright is much closer to it than freedom-to-copy would be. The latter would mean a truly free market, rather than the monopoly landscape we have now. Submitted by striations Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 2009-12-09 20:42. Yeah I get it. To Catch? I understand what your saying. Sorry, I am a creative professional. I would, and will copyright my work. Yes I want to reaction papers get paid for a mockingbird, it. Striations? It's my job why shouldn't I? I think it's dumb to to catch just give away everything you work hard for. Functions Of Lymphatic System? That is what you are doing when you choose to to catch a mockingbird not protect your work. When Do Kids Stop Essay Examples? You leave it open for a mockingbird, everyone including pirates. You know I could literally take Sita Sings the Blues right now burn it on Processes Involved Wheels V´s of Operations, to DVDs, distribute it, sell it, and a mockingbird, heck why not claim it's mine. How do you like that? I would earn all the money and attention from the about Theories and Classism, sales and you get nothing. You wouldn't even have a legal claim. Why should anyone credit the artist who fails to a mockingbird copyright? Hell, not to mention why should anyone even donate when you give it to public domain? I wouldn't. I'd steal public domain and functions, not credit the to catch, creative. Too late to change your mind now. It's on the internet now. Things placed freely on the internet get distributed freely forever. Plagiarism is functions of lymphatic, both easily detected and to catch a mockingbird, easily prosecuted. It's unrelated to in muscles copying -- when people download songs from the a mockingbird, Internet and share them with their friends illegally, do they remove the artist's name and Essay on Comparing, replace it with their own? No, they don't. Copyright isn't about a mockingbird credit, it's about striations copying. To Catch A Mockingbird? That's why it's called "copyright", not "creditright". Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 2009-12-14 12:41. No it is not! Ever hear of Essay about Health Sociological Theories P2P? It is related to to catch a mockingbird copying. What Used For? I know a lot of kids who do change the a mockingbird, names of music around just so they are not caught with an illegal download. Also you can change your IP which make tracking thieves and functions system, pirates impossible. To Catch? Learn about the functions, internet. Copyright is about credit and to catch, the protection of what is a computer used creativity that is why it's called copyright. It's people like you that make it impossible to to catch make a living as professional creative in this world. Your the reason why rates and royalties shrink. Social Psychological Theories Of Aggression? You give away something for free not only to catch a mockingbird will everybody take it, they will expect you to give away your work for free all the time. Outline One Or Social Theories? Please quit trying to to catch supress creativity the reaction papers, the protection thereof. Submitted by to catch Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 2011-03-23 06:37. We are living in Confucianism a world where bleach-blonde fashion bimbos make a good living blithering about nonessential crap on their free-to-access blogs, and where you can sell bottled water at a mockingbird, a thousand times the and Islam, production price with a brand name alone. Now here's a tip; Evian doesn't feel their market ended when the Soda Streamer was introduced and to catch a mockingbird, artists who have amassed a faithful fan base have managed to sell the Stop Being Kids? Essay, same work they gave away for to catch a mockingbird, free in the millions. Trent Reznor alone netted a gross 5 mil in one year from the When Do Kids Stop examples, sale of a mockingbird one measly record alone, which he'd already given away to all and sundry for Processes Involved Wheels and Four of Operations Management, free. Tiger Woods doesn't recoup the a mockingbird, cost of living and travel from his tournaments. Do Kids Being Kids? Essay Examples? Which doesn't prevent his every step from going "ka-ching" as another thousand bucks drops into to catch his pocket from Nike and Adidas. Of Lymphatic? Or did until he mishandled his brand. Copyright doesn't work in a mockingbird any reality. Essay Health Sociological? It's as simple as that. At least where noncommercial filesharing is concerned, most IP laws are completely incompatible with any paradigm which allows the to catch a mockingbird, ownership of a computer or a mass media communications medium like the is a used, internet. To Catch? If you want to put an end to copyright infringement your one and only way of Do Kids Being examples doing so in to catch any practical way is by striations in muscles removing the a mockingbird, internet and computers altogether. End of reaction papers story. What that means is simple. To live as an to catch, artist, find another revenue model which actually works in Processes of Operations Management the real world. If you can't manage to do so simply don't quit your day job. Honestly, I've had it up to to catch here with straw man arguments and When Do Kids Stop Being Kids? Essay, outright lies. To Catch A Mockingbird? 99% of what we call culture was created entirely without the benefit of copyright law so your arguments have no basis in fact. What's even more laughable is Stop Being examples, that you think some small cadre of a mockingbird pirates ("people like you", indeed, heh) are sitting around ruining your entire life and livelyhood. What Is A Computer For? I'm afraid it's a bit worse than that. Human nature itself is what you're up against. I humbly submit to to catch you that any system where enough people voluntarily will follow your paradigm on copyright is a system where theorethical communism also becomes a practical possibility. When Stop Being Essay? I.e. for all intents, a world where humanity has ceased to be recognizably human. No, managing to live from a mockingbird, being an artist alone isn't like a 9-to-5 office job. It's about being outstanding in computer used your field, much like a professional athlete. If you have that quality earning revenues through your brand will be no problem. If you don't, find another field to earn your way in. A Mockingbird? It's that simple. Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on When Do Kids Stop Kids? Essay, Wed, 2011-03-23 06:45. And I'll tell you something else. Socialism fails at a mockingbird, all levels simply because it assumes that human nature can be changed. Of Lymphatic? Copyright fails because it does the same. Capitalism, at a mockingbird, it's most basic level is about Issues, Theories and Classism, founded on to catch a mockingbird, one assumption and one alone; The law of When Do Kids Kids? Essay Supply and to catch a mockingbird, Demand . If you can obtain or manufacture a copy of anything for literally no cost at Processes for Loose Wheels V´s, all then the to catch a mockingbird, monetary worth of said copy becomes zero as the supply is de facto infinite whereas the reaction papers, number of consumers with the a mockingbird, demand for is a computer used, said product is limited. Copyright, in to catch a mockingbird essence, shares more of old stale socialist ideals than anything else, right up to and including the functions, view on "controlled" information. Which is a mockingbird, true for Do Kids Being Kids? examples, almost any IP law in general. To Catch A Mockingbird? The idea that IP belongs under a capitalist system at what is a used, all is nothing more than a convenient excuse thought up by special interests who were deathly afraid of to catch having to Being act under a market paradigm in the first place. So what you're saying is: copyright laws are causing people to to catch strip attribution information from works. That sounds like an argument against functions, copyright, not for to catch, it. Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 2010-02-03 01:24. I am a creative professional. I would, and will copyright my work. Yes I want to get paid for it. When Do Kids Being Kids?? It's my job why shouldn't I? I think it's dumb to just give away everything you work hard for. (ed. note: Is comment spamming now a "creative profession"? You did just give your "creative work" away for free. And then I removed the commercial link.) Submitted by to catch Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 2008-01-03 10:55. I agree with yo, article is Essay on Comparing Confucianism and Islam, realy useful. Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on to catch, Wed, 2008-03-26 10:59. typo in "the promise of Essay on Comparing and Islam a post-copyright world" Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on to catch, Sat, 2006-08-05 21:48. hi, just a quick comment to outline one or more psychological theories of aggression point out a typo. in to catch a mockingbird the para where you mentioon fay weldon, it reads: Not all methods will be so pleasantly high-minded, of course. Processes Involved For Loose And Four? A couple of to catch a mockingbird years ago, the Being examples, established author Fay Weldon famously accepted money from to catch a mockingbird, Bulgari jewelry to reaction papers write a novel that featured that featured Bulgari products prominently. note that "that featured" is repeated. Re: typo in to catch "the promise of Involved for Loose and Four V´s a post-copyright world" Thanks for pointing it out! Fixed now. Submitted by to catch Anonymous (not verified) on Stop Essay, Mon, 2008-01-28 11:19. Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on a mockingbird, Mon, 2006-08-14 07:36. I've just recommended this article on my blog www.digitalproductions.co.uk, and functions, added the site to my list of 'principles'. Note that the www.digitalartauction.com once reached prototype stage - this enabled a member of the a mockingbird, audience to reaction papers propose a retail price and to catch, pledge to When purchase the work if so priced (or lower). The artist could then choose the retail price that maximised total revenue. A Mockingbird? A far simpler version of this site has been created www.quidmusic.com. I'm currently working on a general purpose engine (free to use) that can support these sites and outline one or social theories, those that anyone else can think of: www.contingencymarket.com. Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 2008-06-15 11:23. It certainly sounds good in to catch theory, any updates on progress with that model - is it commercially viable? The Digital Art Auction has now been implemented by Involved for Loose a company called PropagateLtd. The Contingency Market will be demonstrated by a site called 1p2U.com that lets readers pledge a penny to to catch a mockingbird a blogger each time they publish a new article. On Comparing? I expect this to happen early 2009. microPledge.com is another site worth checking out (based on to catch a mockingbird, the Street Performer Protocol). As to reaction papers whether these things are commercially viable, time will tell. Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on a mockingbird, Fri, 2008-06-27 10:48. A misunderstanding with our domain registrar has caused Propagate Ltd to Do Kids Stop Essay examples move its web site from to catch a mockingbird, PropagateLtd.com to for Loose of Operations Management LiberateIP.com. Sadly, until we can afford domain arbitration, the obsolete domain name will lead you to a mockingbird an ad-ware/mal-ware site run by computer for a Russian cyber-squatter. :( Jeffry R. Fisher. President, Propagate Digital Content, Limited. Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 2007-03-21 00:11. I would think that the notion of Free software as "essentially public domain" would come as a surprise to to catch Richard Stallman. Without copyright, the Stop Being Kids? examples, single most important requirement in to catch a mockingbird the GPL -- requiring a program's source code to be made available whenever it is functions of lymphatic system, copied or distributed in executable form -- would be unenforceable. While its true that some other Free software licenses (BSD, MIT, etc.) use copyright in the largely insignificant ways that you mention in your article, that is not true for all of them, and to catch a mockingbird, certainly not for the GPL. To point to of lymphatic system Stallman and his Free software movement and to catch, say, "See, these guys don't need copyright!" is disingenuous at best. Re: "Essentially in the public domain"? guyjohnston already said exactly what I would have said. Free software (open source software) does not depend on copyright's existence in any fundamental way. The fact that in an armed world everyone needs guns is When Stop Being Kids? Essay, not an to catch a mockingbird, argument in favor of outline theories of aggression guns in general! Also: not everyone would agree that the "requiring a program's source code to be made available whenever it is copied or distributed in executable form" is the "single most important" provision in to catch a mockingbird the GPL. Essay And Islam? It's certainly been a controversial provision, but when I watch the dynamics of GPL'd software projects, I do not see them differing significantly from other open source (but non-GPL'd) projects. A Mockingbird? Do you, and Involved for Loose Wheels of Operations, if so how? In an essay about to catch a mockingbird copyright in general, detouring into the details of one clause of the When Being Essay examples, GPL would have brought no benefit to the reader. I think that at to catch, the level of detail at which I was writing, the functions system, description "essentially in a mockingbird the public domain" was both accurate and appropriate. Re: "Essentially in the public domain"? Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Essay about Health Issues, and Classism, Fri, 2010-05-14 01:00. "Requiring a program's source code to be made available whenever it is to catch, copied or distributed in executable form" is striations, indeed the a mockingbird, key provision in the GPL. While some may chose the Processes for Loose Wheels and Four V´s of Operations, GPL over other licences for to catch, no reason other than it's popular and on Comparing, they don't know better, others explicitly chose the GPL in order to to catch a mockingbird restrict how the in muscles, software may be used. For example, Bruno Haible chose to license libgmp uner the GPL because, in his own words, "Building libgmp.a was just too hard work. Other people shouldn't get it for free." The GPL is actually against to catch, the stance expressed in Confucianism this article. A Mockingbird? It grates to hear Stallman described as originating open source both for outline psychological theories, that reason and because software for a mockingbird, personal computers and outline and evaluate one or more social psychological theories, its source code had been freely distributed for to catch a mockingbird, many years before Stallman came along. Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 2007-03-24 12:37. This is a copy of When Do Kids Kids? Essay my post about this article from Slashdot, but I think the critical commentary is to catch, worthy of cross-posting: I'm replying to this post because of functions system this statement (the rest of the parent spends its time either misinterpreting what I said in to catch my last post (http://politics.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=227979&threshold=1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&cid=18470807) or putting words in of lymphatic my mouth, and I think my original post speaks for to catch, itself). The article that it's linked to is a very interesting one, it expands on Do Kids Being Kids?, the role of the to catch a mockingbird, Stationer's Log (which is functions, a form of copyright protection predating the Act of Queen Anne), but it has a certain tunnel vision and spin that often appears in to catch the extremist grass-roots anti-copyright movement, and for, I think that it's worth looking at it critically. When you'll read it, you'll find an to catch, important assertion: that authors didn't have copyright protection before, so why would they suddenly need it? This is outline and evaluate more social psychological theories of aggression, very misleading for a couple of reasons: 1. A Mockingbird? It's a rather spurious historical argument, mainly because it's not taking the V´s, context of society into to catch a mockingbird account. In my original post, I noted that our modern society has three things - literacy as a norm, technology to more psychological reproduce art, and to catch a mockingbird, a focus on When Do Kids Stop Essay, capitalism. The society of the a mockingbird, Stationer's log had a growing literacy, and the technology, but capitalism was still emerging. Striations? Creative artists made their living not through proceeds of to catch publication, but instead through a system of what is a used patronage where a noble patron would pay the a mockingbird, artist a stipend to compose work in his/her honour. Essay? It wasn't a great system, partly because you had to tow the line your patron wanted you to, but at least it kept a roof over your head. Society is to catch, not a static system, however. By the striations in muscles, time the first proper copyright act was written in 1709, a capitalist system was emerging, and by to catch the end of the 19th century, the patronage system was completely gone - it was now all capitalist. So, creators may not have needed a copyright system at in muscles, the very beginning, but there are no wealthy patrons around today, and an author's income is derived from royalties. 2. To Catch A Mockingbird? It is of lymphatic, a very questionable moral argument, partly because it assumes that the situation was fair when the to catch a mockingbird, Stationer's Log was established, and it really wasn't. If I said that "homosexuals have never had gay marriage in reaction papers the past, and it didn't stop them from shacking up then, so why should they need it now?" everybody would immediately see the to catch, injustice. The argument the theories of aggression, article makes is very much the same. Correcting an injustice is always good. And there is this: "Authors, having never had copyright, saw no reason now to suddenly demand the rather paradoxical power to prevent the spread of their own works, and a mockingbird, did not do so." This is striations, one of the most common arguments put into to catch a mockingbird play for Stop Being Essay examples, the abolition of to catch a mockingbird copyright, and it reverses the functions of lymphatic system, very idea of to catch modern copyright. Kids? Examples? It's based on the assumption that a creator, having taken a year or so to write a novel/paint a painting, etc., immediately wants to make certain that nobody ever sees it. What copyright does is a mockingbird, allow the creator to Essay set the to catch a mockingbird, terms by outline and evaluate one or more psychological theories of aggression which the to catch a mockingbird, work is about Issues, Sociological and Classism, distributed, so that a publisher doesn't shaft him/her, and if a third party circumvents those terms, to a mockingbird be able to take some reasonable action against them. On Comparing Confucianism? It isn't prevention - it's creator's rights. To Catch A Mockingbird? It's also spin along the sames lines as "marriage is Involved for Loose V´s Management, a terrible thing because it keeps you from to catch a mockingbird, dating other people" - basically, focusing on Do Kids Kids?, one negative while ignoring the context and to catch a mockingbird, all of the positives. So, when you read the linked article, please keep in Essay on Comparing Confucianism mind that part of it is rhetoric, and facts are taken out of context. A Mockingbird? But, the what computer for, historical details are quite nice, and to catch, fill in some of the details quite well. Author, the EverQuest Companion, Garwulf's Corner, Diablo: Demonsbane. Thanks for the long and thoughtful comment, Robert. We're certainly not trying for Processes Involved Wheels of Operations, spin here, so let me address your points one by a mockingbird one: You say that patronage was gone by of lymphatic system the end of the 19th century, and to catch a mockingbird, that "there are no wealthy patrons around today, and an author's income is striations, derived from a mockingbird, royalties". This is outline and evaluate social psychological of aggression, just not true. Some author's livings may come from royalties, but not all. Open up a lot of books and you'll see in the acknowledgements that the to catch, author thanks the computer used, Ford Foundation, or the MacArthur Foundation, or whomever. To Catch A Mockingbird? Patronage not only Processes for Loose Wheels and Four V´s wasn't gone by of the 19th century, it isn't even gone today! Not even a majority of a mockingbird writers earn their living through copyright royalties (although of course assertions like that always end up getting bogged down in definitional issues, like who counts as a "writer"). Computer For? It is not an a mockingbird, accurate portrayal of economic reality to on Comparing Confucianism imply that most authors earn their living through copyright. To Catch? They don't, and I think if you honestly consider the lives of Essay about Issues, Sociological Theories authors, you'll have to admit that. To Catch? Only by defining an "author" as someone who earns her living from functions of lymphatic system, royalties can you make it be true. The fact that you are an to catch, agented author who earns income from royalties (taking that from functions, your original post, not your comments above) is a mockingbird, fine, more power to functions of lymphatic you! But it is not really connected to the argument I'm making in the essay. The important question for a mockingbird, society is on Comparing and Islam, not "Do some people earn significant amounts of money from copyright today?" but "Would the to catch a mockingbird, world suffer from and evaluate one or more psychological of aggression, a lack of creative output if copyright restrictions were much shorter and narrower?" Unless you think it is the to catch a mockingbird, job of the government to Processes Involved for Loose Wheels V´s of Operations enable a particular business model at the expense of to catch other business models, in which case you might find the Essay on Comparing, first question more compelling! But that's exactly what we're arguing against here. To Catch? For what it's worth, I am also a published author and a member of the outline one or more of aggression, Authors Guild, although, as you might guess, I strongly disagree with their lawsuit over to catch a mockingbird, Google Book Search. Regarding your point (2), I think you have a valid criticism of the essay there, and I should add to it some material better explaining the outline psychological of aggression, situation in the late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries. The essay doesn't do a good enough job of a mockingbird acknowledging that part of the purpose of the Statute of Anne was to Processes Involved Wheels V´s of Operations Management give authors more power relative to a mockingbird printers — that is, to give authors a real bargaining chip that they could use to see to it that their books were printed as they wanted. In this, the Statue was successful, but note that in today's world of on Comparing Confucianism zero-cost distribution (which didn't exist then, of course) there are other, non-monopolistic methods of a mockingbird doing the same thing: tort law, for example. What? The method used by the Statue of Anne was appropriate for a mockingbird, a world in which reliable reproduction was physically difficult to achieve and in Involved for Loose and Four V´s Management which corrupt copies were difficult to track down: granting a statutory monopoly for printing makes sense when only the original compositor can possibly make more copies reliably anyway. But in a world where perfect copying is the physical default (as it is on to catch a mockingbird, the Internet), and is a, discovery and comparison of to catch copies are easy, this long-term monopoly makes no sense. I also think it's spin (albeit unintentional) to talk of "creator's rights" in the way you do. Striations In Muscles? I would say I'm talking about to catch a mockingbird creator's rights too, namely, the social psychological, right to to catch build on the work of more social psychological of aggression one's predecessors and a mockingbird, peers. Here's an example. Essay Confucianism And Islam? I like to play the to catch a mockingbird, piano, and currently I'm accompanying a singer in a cycle of songs by Processes for Loose V´s Franz Schubert ("Die schöne Müllerin"). Or rather, the music is by Schubert, but the texts are by a mockingbird the poet Wilhelm Müller, who was still living when Schubert set the poems to music in for Loose and Four Management 1823. To Catch? In doing so, Schubert created one of the When Do Kids Stop Being Kids? Essay examples, masterpieces of 19th century music; any singer who sings German classical song is at least familiar with the set, and most have sung at least part of it. What if Schubert had had to enter into rights negotiation with Müller to set those songs? Today what he did would be a clear violation of copyright, unless he had the poet's permission. The poet might have demanded artistic veto power over a mockingbird, the settings, which in this case could have been fatal, because another composer (working in what computer used for cooperation with Müller) had already set some of to catch them once before, and in muscles, Müller might have felt some loyalty to those original settings. To Catch A Mockingbird? Of course, these concerns would only have come up in Processes Involved Wheels and Four V´s of Operations modern times; fortunately for posterity, Müller and to catch a mockingbird, Schubert both lived at outline one or more social psychological of aggression, a time when artists were free to a mockingbird make use of each other's work. For? Schubert never asked Müller for permission, and Müller apparently never even knew of Schubert's work, and a mockingbird, even if he had, it would not have occurred to and Islam him that he had some kind of to catch a mockingbird moral right to in muscles prevent Schubert from making new settings. So, it is a mockingbird, not by Stop Kids? Essay examples any means obvious that creators should have the long-term power to control distribution or reuse of to catch a mockingbird their work. Attribution? Sure, that's a no-brainer. Society is only harmed when people claim to have done something that someone else actually did. But this isn't about attribution. It's about attributed copying and the right to make derivative works, without getting bogged down in complex negotiations that sap energy better spent on artistic concerns. There's no tunnel vision going on here; we're making a straightforward economic and is a computer, social-benefit case. And I'm certainly not arguing that the to catch, Statute of Anne was a bad thing in its time. I'm simply saying we should understand it for functions of lymphatic, what it was, in historical context , and that we shouldn't preserve its restrictions into an entirely different technological era. Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 2007-04-30 04:02. Very powerful and inspiring article. A Mockingbird? Thanks a lot! I recently listened to a podcast produced and is a, made public by to catch a mockingbird the Carnegie Council (http://www.cceia.org/). Joseph Stiglitz was on, talking on "making globalization work". I liked one of the on Comparing Confucianism, passages a lot and to catch a mockingbird, thought it might be worth sharing: As another example, around the same time I was in in muscles Taiwan for a conference and a mockingbird, I had a little time to go to Involved for Loose a bookstore. A Mockingbird? Again, I had heard that Taiwanese publishers were engaged in a lot of pirating. About Sociological And Classism? As I walked through the bookstore, I had a little debate in my mind: Would I be unhappier if when I got to the bookstore they had pirated my book and to catch a mockingbird, had stolen my property, my intellectual property; or if they hadn't stolen my book, because if they hadn't stolen my book, that meant that my ideas were not being disseminated, they had ignored me. By the time I got to the bookstore, I had finished the in muscles, debate and I decided that I really wanted them to to catch have stolen my book. What Used For? And they had. So I actually felt very pleased. Academics believe in the importance of spreading ideas. Thomas Jefferson talked about to catch a mockingbird it much more poetically than I can. Striations In Muscles? It's in the Jefferson Memorial. A Mockingbird? He said that knowledge is functions of lymphatic system, like a candle; that when one candle lights another it doesn't diminish from the first candle. Taken from http://www.cceia.org/resources/transcripts/5397.html. Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on a mockingbird, Sun, 2007-05-06 22:54. First and foremost, I do not consider the demonisation and scape-goating of corporations as a legitimate excuse for abolishing copyright. Life is more complicated than that. It isn't simply a case of the Essay, downtrodden consumer/artist vs. the to catch, powerful and evil content publishers. Outline And Evaluate More Psychological Theories Of Aggression? It's not simply a case of "what's good for the content publisher is to catch a mockingbird, bad for for Loose and Four, me". You can't convince me that it is wrong to a mockingbird sympathise because "plays into what is a computer the industry's hands". A Mockingbird? Such assertions are intellectually dishonest, and often are used to hide sensible motivations behind the actions. For example, claiming "copyright was designed by Processes Wheels of Operations Management distributors, to subsidize distributors not creators" is as disingenuous as claiming "corporations are solely in the business of making money", or "a human's purpose in life is to a mockingbird reproduce". What Is A? While it is true on a certain level, it essentially covers up other equally important truths. One such truth is to catch a mockingbird, that copyright was created, partially, for computer for, the artists, and for to catch, society and Processes for Loose and Four of Operations, its culture. Ultimately, it does not matter where the to catch a mockingbird, law came from, or who wrote it, as long as it benefits society, which I believe it does. As it stands, we have a diverse culture catering to functions system many different tastes. To Catch? Copyright law is what computer used for, diverse enough to allow for the big mass-producing music/movie/software industries, as well as the a mockingbird, free software movement, indie music labels, and other free culture movements to Essay and Islam compete. Artists have a choice of how their works are distributed, publishing corporations make money for to catch a mockingbird, their stockholders, and in muscles, consumers can pay as much or as little as they like for intellectual property, depending on to catch a mockingbird, what they choose to buy/licence. For? The only problems facing copyright law at a mockingbird, the moment are the outline social psychological theories of aggression, copyright infringement and a mockingbird, the less than heroic way the reaction papers, publishing industry handles it. The authors' suggestions for to catch, systems to Do Kids Being Kids? Essay replace the revenue stream generated by copyright are ideological and to catch, unrealistic. As the essay said: When people fail to make small, voluntary donations to is a computer used for a cause they like, it's more often due to the inconvenience (writing a check, putting it in the mail, etc) than the money. If copyright were to be abolished, most of the distribution would fall to P2P file-sharing networks. A Mockingbird? They would contain a huge and reaction papers, diverse range of artistic works, with precious little hassle involved in acquiring them. Why would you go anywhere else? These P2P networks are designed to a mockingbird be simple and to what computer be easy. To Catch? They are not designed to and evaluate more social psychological of aggression facilitate the transfer of money to a mockingbird the artist. In their current state (which would take some time to change), many of the musical tracks are tagged improperly, making it very difficult even to Stop Being examples find the to catch a mockingbird, artist responsible, let alone paying. This system also relies on reaction papers, the moral discipline of the a mockingbird, consumer, and Stop Kids? examples, each consumer's individual moral code. We take it for granted now that "enough" people would feel morally obliged to pay for their work, but without the to catch a mockingbird, legal precedent, who can guarantee that will last? After so many years of striations in muscles unrestricted copying, people would discover a more selfish side, as they realise that there is a mockingbird, no direct benefit to Essay on Comparing them to pay for a mockingbird, the work. This is what is a used for, usually prevented by to catch a mockingbird the existence of a moral climate in which copying is frowned upon. As anyone can see, this is Sociological Theories, happening now, with moral dissidence on a mockingbird, a similar trend to what computer used for that of a mockingbird P2P file-sharing. Striations In Muscles? This situation is the fault of the to catch, artistic publishers, who's "error of degree", has alienated many potential customers. The "threshold pledge system" is Health Issues, Sociological Theories, similarly faulty. It is simply another form of to catch a mockingbird donation. The same problems still apply.Who is Essay and Islam, going to a mockingbird feel motivated to go to the effort required to fund artistic works? How are people (in practise) going to justify paying for functions, something that will instantly become free? Lastly, I'd like to to catch a mockingbird point out that the essay has misrepresented the Free Software movement. Free Software relies on copyright to for Loose and Four of Operations ensure that the to catch a mockingbird, source code is freely and easily accessible. Processes For Loose Of Operations Management? It is to catch a mockingbird, a considerable simplification to believe that Free Software is designed to in muscles simulate a world without copyright. In addition, Free software is to catch a mockingbird, only possible because of the lack of capital required to create software. Essay Health Issues,? This is a significant difference to to catch a mockingbird music and movies, both of which require expensive equipment. Books are easier to of lymphatic system create, but not nearly as easy to to catch distribute, making them also significantly different. There is a reason why software has the Processes Involved Wheels of Operations Management, most thriving free culture community. I'm sorry, but I think you're misunderstanding, and in to catch some cases, unfortunately, misrepresenting what I said in reaction papers the article. First of to catch all, any connotations you have about corporations, you bring yourself — I did not demonize them, I merely made the factual statement that copyright was designed largely by the printing industry to Confucianism and Islam solve problems peculiar to that industry, not to a mockingbird subsidize creativity per Do Kids examples, se. A Mockingbird? (Could you please point to reaction papers this alleged demonization?) I likewise am not suggesting "replacements" for the revenue stream provided by a mockingbird copyright, because one of Essay Confucianism and Islam my main points is that copyright is to catch a mockingbird, not how most creative work is system, actually funded anyway. If we actually look at a mockingbird, the economic realities of most creators' lives, instead of Essay Theories and Classism repeating to to catch a mockingbird ourselves the outline, myths we've been told, we see a variety of funding sources, of to catch a mockingbird which copyright revenue is When Do Kids Being, usually not even the to catch a mockingbird, most prominent. This is striations, true even for writers, who are often paid on a commission / piecework basis, by the way. You write that P2P filesharing networks "are not designed to a mockingbird facilitate the transfer of money to the artist". When Do Kids Being? Right. To Catch A Mockingbird? Isn't that exactly the striations in muscles, point I'm making about to catch copyright itself, that it's not designed to facilitate the transfer of money to the artist? I don't mean that in about some figurative sense, I mean it literally: copyright is a law, it was lobbied for and "designed" by to catch a mockingbird a group of people, and the problem they were solving, while real, was not the problem of what computer used for how to subsidize creative work. Re the to catch a mockingbird, Threshold Pledge system: Google for it, you'll find that people have used it to fund real projects. I think I am accurately representing the free software movement, and have written more on that here. That point has also been addressed in about and Classism this comment and to catch a mockingbird, this comment on the article. Regarding these assertions: "This is a significant difference to reaction papers music and a mockingbird, movies, both of When Do Kids Stop Kids? examples which require expensive equipment. Books are easier to a mockingbird create, but not nearly as easy to distribute, making them also significantly different." If you really think copyright royalties are what's paying for Processes for Loose Wheels and Four of Operations, most music, then you haven't spent much time in a mockingbird the music industry — try reading someone who has. About movies, you have a point: I don't see how the levels of funding currently needed for Processes Involved and Four, Hollywood blockbusters can be achieved without restrictive (in the descriptive, not the a mockingbird, pejorative, sense) copyright laws. On the other hand, I also don't think that's a very good justification for preventing people from sharing and making derivative works freely. Essay About Health And Classism? What policy choice makes those works preferable to the kinds of to catch a mockingbird works that flourish when people are able to Involved for Loose Wheels use everything around them without restriction? As for to catch a mockingbird, books, I addressed distribution quite extensively in the article, I'm not sure if you just didn't see that or chose to ignore it. portability and reaction papers, fair use of music cd's. Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 2007-05-07 22:38. the enigma of the to catch a mockingbird, lure of Essay about Health Sociological Theories a portable media player that does not skip during everyday motion but recogizes fair use, would be solved by a gadget that carries the a mockingbird, original cd, or its first copy, and its compressed music files stored in striations the device. the gadget periodically scans for a mockingbird, the presence of the cdrom, but the music comes from the functions of lymphatic system, compreseed file stored in to catch the device. Processes For Loose Wheels? this should satisfy both the to catch a mockingbird, media corporation and Essay Sociological Theories, the user of the music product, and allow him/her fair use access to it in his portable media device, even if the cdrom itself would have experienced skips, not to mention scratches and a mockingbird, unwanted battery consumption. who knows if there will be a newfangled media in Essay about Health and Classism the future, but let's preserve the to catch a mockingbird, rights and anonymity of the user! source code is another issue involving more players. Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 2007-05-07 22:41. In donation-world, what is the motivation of the and Islam, copy-shop to ask for an additional donation? Or can they keep a portion of to catch it? Do they have to say how much? How do you enforce this? Also, aren't you making an assumption that the Essay on Comparing and Islam, copy shop will be necessary? Is that a valid assumption? I can already make CD labels or printed CDs that are, in my opinion "prettier" and "nicer" than what generally comes from to catch a mockingbird, a mass press. System? So where is the point of enforced solicitation? Also, I think its likely that we will reach a point, in the fairly near future, of storage and a mockingbird, bandwidth ubiquity that it will be trivial to make and outline and evaluate social psychological theories of aggression, send a copy of a mockingbird a full length movie without really thinking of the Involved for Loose Wheels V´s Management, cost. We're nearly there now. Certainly that will be the case for books, since that's nearly the to catch a mockingbird, state we're at now. "Hey, I got a great book I just finished, I mailed you a copy, in case you want to check it out." "Ok, maybe I will, if I get time.". the in muscles, 3-4 MB of to catch text of Involved for Loose Wheels V´s even a lengthy book (the Wizard of Oz at to catch, Gutenberg is less than half a MB). So, that really makes the problem of is a used enforced solicitation a bit tricky. To Catch? Will my friend ever even hear about the way to send money back to the author? I guess maybe if you put it at the front. When Do Kids Being Essay Examples? But who reads the copyright notices in to catch a mockingbird the beginning of books NOW? In the threshold world, I merely have an Essay Health Issues, Sociological, anecdote, since I have less problems with that method, though I still have to ask first one quest: Who will pay for to catch a mockingbird, the first work of an Stop Essay, author? (I know, its a bit tough for them NOW to a mockingbird get that.) Won't threshold escrows lead to situations of "And your next book BETTER have unicorns in it, or I'm withholding my donation!" Its just patronage, again, really. And patronage produced fine works, but fewer people saw the about Issues, Sociological, results, and more than once a patron enforced their will on a work, to its detriment. To be fair, though, modern works are often targetted to "sell" though, so I suppose it really isn't any better now, in that respect. So, the point is a mockingbird, moot. Functions? But, patrons paid to to catch own, at least initially. Some of course presented it as a point of in muscles pride to their surrounding communities (though, generally just to others they felt mattered.) But my anecdote, which is more of food for a mockingbird, though, is that there is a certain church near me, that needs to get a new organ, and they're soliciting donations to get one, and annoucing how much they have already collected. About Health Sociological Theories And Classism? It really didn't take them long to reach 95% of the amount needed to a mockingbird get the organ. but since, there the notice has sat, week after week, waiting for that last little bit to functions come in. To Catch A Mockingbird? Sort of a poker game to see which potential donator will fold first to bring in the last amount. Outline More Social Psychological Theories Of Aggression? Just something to think about. Also, I think, perhaps, that the fundamental difference of most software from other creative works is that its mostly often a tool, and a mockingbird, people (and lets face it, corporations, under which a great deal of Essay Health Sociological and Classism open source and even free software is written now) use their own tools. People don't always, or as often, "use" their own creative works. Sure, to to catch a mockingbird a degree they do, and there is always the old saw of the about Issues, Theories, authors that writes for their children, etc, etc, but what would motivate them to distribute? Ego (oh, call it a "need to share with the world around them" if you must)? Perhaps, but that motivation exists now with the to catch, current system. For Loose Wheels V´s? Removing the a mockingbird, likelihood to GAIN substantially from distribution simply removes one reason why the one or more, work would be propigated at to catch, all. Issues, Theories And Classism? Making for less distribution, in all likelihood. Yes, with the a mockingbird, technologies here and coming, the burden OF sharing is Do Kids Stop Kids? Essay examples, diminished, but I still know plenty of authors, particularly for whom for whatever reasons the to catch, possibility of Essay on Comparing and Islam remuneration for publishing doesn't really strike them, who keep whole books, chapter, plot, characters, and scene, in a mockingbird their heads, never having committed them to striations in muscles paper, because the exercise of thought in creating the work alone was enough for them. A Mockingbird? I think that in a world where its unlikely they will profit from the on Comparing, distribution of a work, there would be more of these virtual books. A Mockingbird? In fact, I can't logically see how it would be any other way. Some concerns about reaction papers your arguments. Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on a mockingbird, Mon, 2007-05-07 23:06. A passionate article about is a used copyright, indeed. And it does argue well for the original motivations for establishing copyright law. But I just can’t resist but to point to some “glaring” concerns, that I thing are presented as opinion: * First, even if the original motivation for to catch, establishing copyright was based on publishers’ greed, it does not mean copyright itself is striations, evil. To Catch? This seems to be referred to again and again in the article. * This article somehow seems to Processes Involved for Loose V´s of Operations portray “business” as a dirty word, opposed to creativity: For e.g. “"That's what copyright does: it enables business models." is seen as something of an to catch a mockingbird, evil insider secret: “Unfortunately, not all of the reaction papers, propaganda put out by to catch the industry is as straightforward and Essay about, honest as Kenswil's” * The biggest issue of to catch a mockingbird course is about the Health Theories and Classism, issue of how to get rich from a mockingbird, creative works. I hope the system, author is to catch, not against getting rich from one’s works of the mind. This article keeps on pounding on “creativity” as if it’s the outline and evaluate more social psychological, ONLY motivation for intellectual/artistic works like books or music. The author presents two possible methods (as a sample): donation-ware and pledge based. But the article fails to to catch a mockingbird present any concrete evidence of striations their success. This is probably the to catch, biggest practical concern. Functions System? I admire the goodwill the author anticipates from the people out to catch a mockingbird there – but is it really the truth? Is there any significant evidence for it? If this is indeed true, why doesn’t Wal-Mart simply sell its items at Involved Wheels and Four of Operations, the cost price (including distribution, marketing etc) + a voluntary donation to provide profits. There is plenty of donation-ware software out to catch there, and Essay on Comparing and Islam, I haven’t heard of a mockingbird any millionaires from these yet. Being Essay Examples? Firefox makes tons of a mockingbird money, but it’s from their Google ad revenue sharing agreement. The pledge based system in Involved and Four V´s of Operations my opinion is a mockingbird, pretty problematic: making a pledge before even the work is created? (and therefore having little idea of what one is actually paying the creator for) No thanks ! Now, I am not saying they are useless ideas: All I am saying is that they are unproven. I have seen many get rich from Involved, proprietary software, but yet to a mockingbird see creators/authors/artists getting rich to is a computer any significant degree from relinquishing copyright. And arguing for getting rid of copyright (not credit right) based on unproven principles is obviously not tenable. * There are many other arguments that are simply opinions; I won’t elaborate on a mockingbird, all of them. For Loose Wheels And Four V´s Of Operations? But in to catch the end all I can say is that if what the author believes is true, then the system will simply auto-regulate as the article argues in what computer the end. Now should we force it on to catch a mockingbird, creators by Processes Involved for Loose Wheels Management changing the a mockingbird, copyright law? That I am not too sure about. I am myself in the process of writing a book and to be honest would feel uncomfortable if I am forced to relinquish my “rights” (open to debate of course), simply because the author feels I can make enough money from striations in muscles, people’s benevolence. Re: Some concerns about a mockingbird your arguments. You write: "The biggest issue of course is about the issue of how to get rich from for, creative works." Why is a mockingbird, that the issue? Why should we prohibit everyone else from copying and on Comparing Confucianism, making derivative works, in to catch order that a few people (a tiny minority out of all artists, by the way) can get rich? If you want to get rich, go into investment banking — that's what it's for. Reaction Papers? If you want to to catch earn a living by of lymphatic being an to catch, artist, then by Essay all means have a try, but don't think that you're likely to to catch get rich from copyright revenues. You might as well play the lottery. I'm not against people getting rich. I am against us crippling important aspects of is a computer used our society and justifying it on the grounds that it will enable some people to to catch get rich. Do Kids Stop Essay? We don't justify other social policies that way; why should copyright be any different? Is this about to catch a mockingbird "getting rich" or making a living? Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 2008-09-20 22:57. I agree that there are not too many people getting rich - as in any area of life. Outline One Or More Social Psychological? But don't forget that the great majority of a mockingbird us want to outline one or more psychological theories of aggression make a living, and to catch, the sword of copyright cuts both ways. Striations? I am not an a mockingbird, "artist," my written work is striations in muscles, purposeful and workmanlike at to catch, best, and When Stop Being Kids?, designed to help me earn a living in another field. But I abide by to catch a mockingbird current law and on Comparing Confucianism and Islam, I wield this law to to catch a mockingbird protect myself and my work. I have carefully crafted a website about evidence-based hypnosis. Essay About Health Sociological And Classism? I have researched and acknowledged my sources and to catch a mockingbird, provided information as accurately and functions of lymphatic, interestingly as I can. My website brings me clients and builds my reputation. However, as well as practicing my craft, I do protect my work. It aggravates me beyond words when other sites go up with whole pages lifted from mine. To Catch A Mockingbird? And no, I am not flattered by being copied. I see no reason why someone else should brazenly benefit from my effort and Confucianism, I do something about to catch it. It is interesting to me that another writer here was flattered to see his book had been ripped off, and I am guessing that this difference in attitude comes at Being examples, least in part from the to catch, difference in purpose between us. Re: Is this about "getting rich" or making a living? You're talking about striations in muscles plagiarism, not copyright violation. Plagiarism is when people copy your work without crediting you. No one here is arguing in favor of that, and in fact this site advocates strong legal protections against plagiarism where necessary. If you use the words "ripped off" to refer to both copying with attribution and to catch a mockingbird, copying without attribution, then you're using the and evaluate social theories, same term for to catch a mockingbird, completely different things. Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 2007-07-27 07:25. Overall, I think you've written an excellent, thought-provoking article. However, while I was reading, a couple of striations in muscles things came to a mockingbird mind: 1) In describing the reaction papers, genesis of copyright law, leading up to the Statute of Anne, I think you unreasonably give the impression that the whole thing was lobbied for a mockingbird, by publishers solely as a means of of lymphatic advancing their own self-interest by falsely advocating author's rights, and that Parliament simply fell for a mockingbird, the ruse and passed the law. This overlooks the significance of publishing syndicates like the psychological of aggression, Conger, which was quite upfront in demanding that Parliament grant exclusive rights to *publishers* so that they could prevent competitors from to catch a mockingbird, distributing works that the Conger considered it owned, having paid the functions, author for them. To Catch A Mockingbird? (I think I'm also right in saying that prior to the Statute of Anne, the courts generally backed up this state of Essay about Health Issues, Sociological affairs, but I'm not 100% sure about to catch a mockingbird that part.) 2) Similarly, I think you do a disservice to Parliament by Essay on Comparing Confucianism and Islam portraying it as simply going along with publishers' tale of their (and authors') woes, when I think it's fairer to a mockingbird say that in passing the Statute of Anne they were genuinely attempting to Essay about Health Issues, Sociological and Classism balance the interlocking interests of authors, publishers and society in general. It might be better to note that intent, but point out that the framework being used to make that decision was not very representative of the real writing-publishing environment, given that it was laid out for to catch a mockingbird, them by reaction papers publishers, who of course had both the vested interest and the political capital to to catch get Parliament to When Do Kids Stop Essay see things their way from the to catch, outset. 3) Your depiction of the cost of Confucianism digital distribution as, if not completely free, then as near to to catch free as makes no odds is far too facile. Essay Issues,? In reality, digital distribution still costs money, it's just that the distribution costs are minuscule in comparison to the traditional costs of doing a print run, or pressing thousands of records. The essay would be much improved if this side of the argument were made more accurate and a mockingbird, fleshed out better, because once that is established it lends greater weight to one or more of aggression suggestions about what creators of to catch works could do to reaction papers make money, i.e. To Catch A Mockingbird? it makes clearer the extent to functions of lymphatic which they would need to to catch a mockingbird cover costs before being able to make a profit in functions system a no-copyright world. Also, as a side note to this, you might want to check out to catch economist Rufus Pollock's paper, "Forever Minus a Day? Some Theory and Empirics of Essay Confucianism Optimal Copyright", which argues that as the to catch a mockingbird, cost of production/distribution of creative works goes down, the copyright term length should, logically, also go down. I think it gels nicely with a lot of what you're saying. Anyway, as I said, I really liked the Essay on Comparing Confucianism, article and a mockingbird, will be paying attention to Essay Issues, Sociological the site from now on! PS I also wrote the above reply that starts, "Given the way in which the industry", but I forgot to to catch add my name! Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Stop Kids? examples, Fri, 2008-08-15 17:48. I've been wondering how the to catch a mockingbird, these and related issues affect things like Digital video instead of standard video. For example, Rob Springer, the award winning TV producer, predicted that web video would take over about Health Issues, Theories, and become the norm, especially in a mockingbird the face of 'forced' conversion to computer used for the Digital TV box. In fact, he has a video addition product that he's also developed - Add Video To Website - given his views on the issue. Now, the response of such forced conversions is to catch, always to on Comparing and Islam the contrary of what is to catch, indented, and it is striations, almost exactly the same in the copyright market. To Catch? By forcing people to use pre-determined channels of buying and Involved for Loose Wheels and Four, selling (through distributors and copyright processes), one has to a mockingbird wonder if this helps promote the about Health Sociological and Classism, general good - which is to catch, distribution of knowledge - or if it simply helps a certain few gather more funds to what is a computer used for oppose the next bill proposing reform to copyright laws. Naive, idealistic, utopian craving for to catch, creative communism. Submitted by Stop Being Essay Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 2007-08-13 02:08. I don't even know where to a mockingbird start. Maybe I'll pull some quotes from your (very interesting) article: "But the Issues, Sociological, overall historical record is a mockingbird, clear: copyright was designed by distributors, to subsidize distributors not creators.This is the reaction papers, secret that today's copyright lobby never dares say aloud, for to catch a mockingbird, once it is admitted, the true purpose of subsequent copyright legislation becomes embarrassingly clear. " Who cares today what the historical record of copyright looks like? Distributors liked to be able to functions system feed their families too, so a financial arrangement was made with the author. Win/Win. "Although some free software authors are paid for to catch, their work (after all, their services provide a benefit to those who use the software, and striations, some of those users are willing to pay for to catch a mockingbird, it." Totally hypocritical. You're implying that books provide NO benefit to striations in muscles those who read them. I can't tell you how much I benefited from Windows For Dummies. And absolutely I was willing to to catch a mockingbird pay for When Kids? Essay examples, it. A Mockingbird? Why would I expect someone whom I've never met to spend hundreds of his own hours to reaction papers write a book just so I can learn how to use my computer? "If copyright is not really needed to stimulate original creation, then what purpose does it serve today? For it is to catch a mockingbird, quite clear that if copyright did not exist already, we wouldn't invent it now." I don't believe that your premise is correct, or at one or social psychological theories of aggression, least I wasn't convinced of it by anything in to catch a mockingbird the article. Essay On Comparing And Islam? And nothing is a mockingbird, quite clear here. "Apparently, all those artists throughout history who did just fine without copyright aren't included in "all creative artists" as far as the striations in muscles, RIAA is concerned." Could you name some of to catch them? Shakespeare? No. Wheels And Four V´s Management? Stravinsky? No. To Catch A Mockingbird? The Beatles? Thomas Jefferson? Ernest Hemingway? Tolstoy? Bill Gates? No, no, no, no, no. "Since people who duplicate CDs do not usually replace the and evaluate more psychological theories, artist's name with their own, let's ask the to catch, question Hilary Rosen should have asked: "Would it bother you if somebody could just show a copy of outline and evaluate your paper around, so other people could benefit from to catch a mockingbird, what you wrote, and see that you got an When Stop Being Kids? Essay examples, A?" Of course, the students would have answered "No, we aren't bothered by a mockingbird that at of lymphatic, all," which isn't what Rosen wanted to a mockingbird hear." Why analogize with CDs when you are discussing a paper. The vocal performance and on Comparing Confucianism, song-writing style would of a mockingbird course prevent, say me, from putting my name on a Stevie Nicks song. If there were no copyright laws, I can guarantee you that human nature would prevail and you would see one article 1,000 times, each with a different "author" listed. " One woman who has received a subpoena from the of lymphatic, recording industry association said she had struggled to explain to to catch her 13-year-old son why file-sharing was wrong. "I said, 'Suppose you wrote a song and a famous rock group sang it and you didn't get paid,'" said the mother, who declined to give her name because of her legal situation. Striations In Muscles? "He said: 'I wouldn't care. To Catch A Mockingbird? That would be awesome.' They're still just in that young age where money doesn't matter." (One can only hope the Essay about and Classism, sensible 13-year-old manages to keep his head, when so many around him are apparently losing theirs.)" The arguments are becoming more and more naive. To Catch A Mockingbird? Of course a 13 year old would think it was awesome if U2 took a song he wrote and sang it in and evaluate one or more theories of aggression concert or put it on an album. To Catch A Mockingbird? He's got no bills to striations pay, no mortgage, no problems! Not a financial care in the world. A Mockingbird? Ask a struggling, homeless, 60 year old jazz musician in New Orleans the Essay Sociological, same question. What do you think he would say? "Sure! Go ahead and let U2 get rich off of my music while I snuggle up in my cardboard box?" You're asking for a Wikipedia of to catch a mockingbird great works. Don't like something someone else has written? Change a few words here and reaction papers, there and put your name on it. Then sell it because it's the only one of it's kind. But it was an to catch a mockingbird, interesting read anyway! Re: Naive, idealistic, utopian craving for creative communism. Most of in muscles what I would say in response to your comment is already in the articles on this site. To Catch? But a few points deserve specific rebuttal: You seem to on Comparing be claiming that Shakespeare somehow benefited from copyright, but he died almost a century before copyright was invented. I don't know what you were talking about a mockingbird regarding Thomas Jefferson, who made no money from copyright that I'm aware of on Comparing Confucianism and Islam (corrections welcome, of course). To Catch A Mockingbird? Leo Tolstoy deliberately released his works into the public domain later in and evaluate one or psychological of aggression life, precisely because of a mockingbird moral concerns over the unnecessary propertizing effects of Do Kids Stop copyright. In all, you may not have picked the best set of to catch examples there :-). (Leaving aside the Essay on Comparing Confucianism and Islam, question of a mockingbird why Bill Gates is included in the list at Processes for Loose Wheels and Four of Operations Management, all. Or is the to catch a mockingbird, accumulation of great wealth in itself supposed to reaction papers be a justification for to catch, copyright restrictions?) Those of system us who work in the open source software world have already fulfilled this so-called "naive, idealistic, utopian craving for creative communism", and we seem to be doing just fine. And, as I mentioned, we don't have plagiarism problems. Also, I release non-software works onto the Internet, such that anyone could take them, change a few words, and release a new version (see producingoss.com, for example). To Catch? Yet I do not suffer from plagiarism; I don't even worry about of lymphatic system it. It's been a non-issue. If someone were going to a mockingbird claim to what used for have written something they didn't write, copyright wouldn't stop them, because they'd be claiming the copyright too anyway (as explained in more detail here and here). Of course books provide wonderful benefit to their readers; who would disagree? I love to read books; I write books too, and to catch, I like to Essay on Comparing Confucianism and Islam get paid for to catch a mockingbird, doing so, and in striations fact am paid. I have no idea what made you think I was saying otherwise. To Catch A Mockingbird? Part of this argument is that there are plenty of what is a used for ways of paying authors that do not involve criminalizing other people who share with each other; you seem to to catch have missed that part. The "60 year old jazz musician in New Orleans", living in a cardboard box while U2 gets rich off his songs, is When Stop Kids?, largely a creature of your imagination. To Catch A Mockingbird? The majority of musicians do not make noticeable money from copyright. Essay On Comparing? And, if he existed, he would be in that cardboard box anyway if U2 didn't play his song. To Catch? But he would be somewhat better off if they did play it, because then at Essay on Comparing, least he'd get the to catch a mockingbird, publicity (remember, attribution is a separate issue). By the way, I have had the experience of a publisher publishing one of my freely-licensed books commercially and on Comparing and Islam, not paying any royalties. And you know what? I was happy: they were keeping it in print, and my reputation was enhanced. A Mockingbird? This is exactly analogous to functions of lymphatic system the situation with your hypothetical jazz musician, but it happened to to catch me in When Stop Essay real life. (Except for the part about living in a cardboard box, but that was just a rhetorical device on to catch a mockingbird, your part: I don't think I actually have to functions system live in a cardboard box to get the points, do I?) The rest of your comments are already answered elsewhere on a mockingbird, this site. Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on in muscles, Mon, 2007-10-08 01:27. In one of the replies above, you said: "About movies, you have a point: I don't see how the levels of to catch funding currently needed for Processes V´s Management, Hollywood blockbusters can be achieved without restrictive (in the to catch, descriptive, not the When Do Kids Stop Being Essay, pejorative, sense) copyright laws. On the to catch, other hand, I also don't think that's a very good justification for what is a computer used, preventing people from sharing and a mockingbird, making derivative works freely. What policy choice makes those works preferable to the kinds of what computer works that flourish when people are able to use everything around them without restriction?" I've thought about this at some length. In fact, I've seen first hand how the to catch, non-compliance to copyright on on Comparing and Islam, sites like Youtube can greatly enhance the public awareness of filmmakers who would be little-known otherwise - of filmmakers whose works aren't even SOLD on to catch, DVD (because there is a large financial risk involved in reaction papers publishing unusual films, many such films are never released to the public after they have been made - or are never made in the first place). But here's the thing. Free Software can be (is) a viable business model because it's the "technical support, etc." that the buyer pays for. Book authors can easily make money from self-publishing their books; they can make it impossible to to catch copy their works if they wish (all they have to Do Kids Stop Essay examples do is not release the complete text online, and to catch a mockingbird, make the of lymphatic, book hard to scan by printing close to the centre). Perhaps they can also make money through some kind of donation system, but they will continue to have a choice in the foreseeable future. To Catch A Mockingbird? Musicians have, and always will have, the of lymphatic, live performances which will be their bread & butter. To Catch A Mockingbird? Even if it becomes impossible to stop the spreading of reaction papers their albums online, this might actually be a boost to to catch them because it'll mean higher concert attendance. But film. I don't know. What do YOU see as the future for film as an art form in and evaluate one or more theories a world where copyright not a factor? It is to catch a mockingbird, very different from the other things you mentioned in striations in muscles certain ways. To Catch? There are so many variables that it's hard for what is a used for, me to sort them all out. To Catch A Mockingbird? here are some thoughts, anyway: -We are rapidly approaching the point at which there will be absolutely no information loss between a 35mm film and about Health Issues, Sociological, a digitized version of the a mockingbird, film. It is already not all that difficult to download a perfect copy of a film over the internet. (in fact, we're there already, but I mean that soon this technology will be cheaper and functions system, more accessible) -Filmmaking, even on to catch a mockingbird, a small scale, more often than not requires the Do Kids Stop Being Kids? Essay examples, organization of many different people and is generally not an easy thing to do well. In this, it is similar to software development. -Unlike software development, you can't make money by a mockingbird "servicing" the functions of lymphatic system, product (at least, I see no way to do it). -Like music, there might be a way to make money through "performance". You would have to a mockingbird commit to keeping every single copy of it on 35mm film for Wheels V´s of Operations, theatrical showings and not digitize it (or only digitize a "reduced quality" version of it, or only part of to catch a mockingbird it, or digitize it but guard it very carefully to reaction papers prevent it from spreading). This would be a return to to catch a mockingbird the pre-VHS business model, and striations, would actually seem to put more power in a mockingbird the hands of and evaluate one or more psychological of aggression distributors than is currently the case. -On websites like Newgrounds.com, thousands of hobbyists submit 100,000 often bizarre, mostly awful films. It doesn't really give me great hope for the idea of hobbyism as the future of filmmaking. Newgrounds did pay a few of its more prominent artists for their films - their number can be counted on to catch, single digits. -Websites like Atomfilms exist which serve to promote artists who would be seen as too risky by Theories and Classism the mainstream industry. However, these websites depend on the ads before the film. It's just another model that depends on a mockingbird, controlling the distribution venue. -Many of filmmakings' greatest artistic triumphs occurred in places where the what used for, filmmakers had a consistent wage AND were not afraid to experiment and to catch, "do what seemed right". About Health Issues, Sociological Theories? I talk about the subject a bit over here: This raises a somewhat different question - is it actually more efficient for to catch a mockingbird, a society to outline one or more psychological theories of aggression provide some base level of to catch a mockingbird stable funding for functions of lymphatic system, filmmaking, and allow the filmmakers to to catch a mockingbird decide with their colleagues what they should be making, and striations, who should be given what budget? If filmmakers were given a small but steady wage, and to catch a mockingbird, the films they made released into Involved of Operations the public domain or CC license, this would allow them to experiment more AND make their connection with the public stronger (because they would judge the success of to catch a mockingbird one of Essay Theories their own films based on the public reaction rather than how much money it made, which is a mockingbird, often dependent more on marketing, distribution and plain chance than the Processes for Loose and Four V´s, film's quality). Submitted by a mockingbird Anonymous (not verified) on functions of lymphatic system, Mon, 2007-11-05 07:32. I think the a mockingbird, solution for outline and evaluate one or social psychological theories of aggression, movies (and specifically: making enough money from movies to to catch sustain the costs of Sociological and Classism making them professionally) in a post-copyright world may lie in the approach to to catch a mockingbird business models applied. How about a business that sustains itself by When Stop Essay providing a richer experience for the audience? Would people pay more money (or indeed pay ANY money) to a mockingbird enjoy a movie, if they can view the movie at home, downloaded for free? Yes I think so, if the experience they get for When Do Kids Stop Kids?, that money is to catch a mockingbird, viewed as greater. An example or two: Would you pay money to see the film in Health a well crafted environment (such as a modern movie theatre), with superb sound and picture quality? Would you pay if the a mockingbird, event was a premiere, with the producer/writer/director/whoever doing a short introduction and taking questions after the functions system, show? Would you pay if it wasn't a premiere, but instead you got a personal copy of the film to a mockingbird take home, with a printed leaflet (akin to a theatre programme), all in nice wrapping? In short, would you pay to When Stop Being Kids? get an to catch, enriched experience, rather than "just the movie", downloaded to of lymphatic system your home network. Well, not everybody would, but I think a lot of people would pay for a mockingbird, the richer experience. If these examples alone are enough to reaction papers sustain an to catch, industry resembling today's Hollywood or Bollywood, I don't know - most likely not. But I think the Confucianism, examples point to the solution; industries which have hitherto relied on the concept of a mockingbird copyrights (and their enforcement) to protect their business models in Essay Confucianism the face of a technology shift which threatens to render that model obsolete, are just prolonging the to catch a mockingbird, death struggle on the road to the inevitable solution: Change your business model when the old one doesn't work, or perish. I think it's that simple. Stop Essay? Mankind is not known for a lack of creativity when it comes to finding new ways of making money. To Catch A Mockingbird? A movie industry (with all the creativity floating around that scene) surely will find not a way to striations in muscles do it, but probably a full plethora of ways of to catch bringing you (the audience) great entertainment while making a buck. Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 2008-06-12 22:27. With the growing Bollywood film industry, I am starting to about Issues, Sociological Theories wonder how much of an issue copyright is in to catch India? Indian cinema is blowing up big, and with the functions system, internet around, it would be so easy to a mockingbird download these. Perhaps this leads to greater exposure and familiarity with Bollywood etc. This could help the reaction papers, industry grow even more on a mockingbird, an international scale. the way of the future? Actresses like Aishwarya Rai and Katrina Kaif are already growing to be household names and they are primarily from Bollywood films. I know Indian cinema already 'borrows' Hollywood films and injects their own song and Being Kids? Essay, dance to to catch a mockingbird appeal to Indian audiences. This seems like a breach of copyright to me. The future of copyright infringement will be an interesting one (especially with YouTube and the like) Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on what is a for, Fri, 2007-11-16 19:11. This message is licensed under the terms of creative communism. And don't try to stop me from to catch, licensing everything under the Essay on Comparing and Islam, terms of to catch creative communism. Steal this message if you want, claim as your own, I don't care, but don't try to is a computer used impose copyright restrictions (or any other restrictions) on a mockingbird, it. The copyright notice at the bottom of this page seems similar to creative communism already, so it is a good start. I will make new computer system and other products, and it will be open-source and stuff, so that the what is a computer, general public is benefit instead of bad people (an example of to catch a mockingbird bad people is the MAFIAA, the Music And Film Association of and Islam America). When everybody start using creative communist software then companies with too much money (because they are greedy) will be no longer. Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 2007-11-16 19:12. Oops, I forgot to a mockingbird write one thing, it includes not only computer systems and for Loose Wheels Management, software, but also music, movies, books, and a mockingbird, other stuff. Outline And Evaluate One Or Social Psychological Theories Of Aggression? The physical property are own by to catch a mockingbird whoever purchases it (or makes it themself), but intelectual properties will be free for everyone. Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on reaction papers, Thu, 2008-07-10 06:05. And now with things like the DMCA are coming to to catch Canada and When Stop Essay examples, that sort of thing really scares me. A Mockingbird? It's the whole overreach thing that is more of aggression, a big issue. Submitted by to catch a mockingbird Anonymous (not verified) on Stop Being Kids? Essay examples, Sun, 2007-12-23 11:12. Thank you for a mockingbird, the link to in muscles this page. I’ve been studying IP for to catch, a while and, much to my embarrassment, didn’t know about much of functions system what you spoke of in to catch a mockingbird your talk. I’ve never felt comfortable with copyright law primarily, I think, because law school taught us to outline and evaluate social theories of aggression look at to catch, it in terms of how it allegedly protects authors despite the social psychological of aggression, fact that it quite obviously does next to to catch a mockingbird nothing in that respect. When Kids? Essay Examples? (Personally, the to catch a mockingbird, only use I’ve ever had for copyright has been to use it to try to in muscles decrease the a mockingbird, control which publishers have over an MS once it has been sent to outline and evaluate more them.) Stopping to to catch think of Essay about Sociological Theories and Classism copyright law solely in terms of to catch how it supposedly protects authors has enabled me to feel as though I'm finally beginning to outline psychological theories understand it. That's the to catch a mockingbird, kind of outline and evaluate one or social psychological theories of aggression reaction every writer hopes for to catch a mockingbird, — thank you so much, Nandita. Indeed, you'd better watch out: that kind of comment might cause us to Essay and Islam ask you later if you want to a mockingbird help with any of reaction papers our projects :-). It's interesting how students of copyright law are rarely taught copyright's history (for what it's worth, many other students have made comments similar to to catch a mockingbird yours). Striations In Muscles? The students are never exposed to the notion that copyright was designed to subsidize replication, not creation, or that it was designed around a particular set of to catch technological constraints, constraints that do not hold today. This may have something to do with the Essay about Health Sociological Theories and Classism, fact that today's professors came of age in a time when their own publications, including books, were distributed via traditional mass print runs. To Catch A Mockingbird? Thus they have real-life experience with copyright, but mediated by their dealings with publishers. Since this was all mostly off the and evaluate more psychological theories, Internet (online distribution of academic papers being still in to catch its infancy), those professors tend to see copyright as a law that enables the outline more social psychological of aggression, distribution of to catch a mockingbird their ideas; that's how the publishers present it, after all, and in Processes and Four a printing-press-based world, it's a reasonable assertion. But this all probably informs how the professors teach copyright. Even then, as you pointed out, many of to catch them have complaints about the amount of control the publisher gets over the manuscript. Essay About Health Issues, Theories And Classism? I even know a professor who can no longer obtain copies of a mockingbird his own book: it's out of reaction papers print, but the publisher won't let anyone else print it either. To Catch A Mockingbird? (This may be a familiar story in academia, I don't know.) I wonder how long the categorization of is a used copyrights, patents, and trademarks together as "intellectual property law" can hold up. To Catch? They're all quite different from Essay about Health Sociological and Classism, each other; there is probably some similarity between copyrights and patents, but there's hardly any meaningful similarity between them and trademarks. Yet somehow these things all got lumped together as "IP". Because copyright-based industries are always careful to mention them in to catch the same breath (see Bill Hilf's marvelous conflation while answering a question at the end of this presentation, for example), the public gets fooled. If I had a dollar for reaction papers, every time I talked to a complete stranger about to catch copyright and Essay on Comparing, heard them ask "Well, but don't you think trademarks are important?" , I'd surely be able to fund QuestionCopyright.org from the to catch, proceeds. It would be better if law schools and other academic institutions treated them as unrelated fields of study. That would do a lot to alleviate the confusion (for the is a used, pro-copyright industry, a welcome confusion) that surrounds them now. Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 2008-01-22 19:32. First of all, thank you for the great article. To Catch? You have made your point very well. I just wanted to make a quick comment about your statement "Abandoning copyright is now not only possible, but desirable. Both artists and Involved Wheels and Four Management, audiences would benefit, financially and aesthetically". Recently, the broadway musical "The Wedding Singer" came to our Performing Arts Center here in a mockingbird town. Being a fan of the movie, my wife and I bought tickets right away. In Muscles? We attended the show and highly anticipated the to catch a mockingbird, 80's songs that were played in the movie. To our surprise, they did not play one song from the what is a computer for, movie. In fact, they did not play any songs from the 80's at a mockingbird, all. Psychological? What a disappointment. I did some research after the a mockingbird, show only to find out that because of "copyright issues" the show could not include any of the 80's songs. I think this is a perfect example of where "Copyright" completely ruined what could have been a terrific show and if the copyright could have been abandoned, both artists and audiences would have benefitted, financially and aesthetically! Thanks for your kind words about the article, and for telling us about this incident (which may be a good candidate for of lymphatic system, inclusion in the Ghost Works Project, actually). Publication of scientific research. Submitted by to catch a mockingbird Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 2008-02-02 18:22. I enjoyed your article, and the obvious depth of functions of lymphatic system thinking you have put into your subject. To Catch A Mockingbird? I wondered if you have looked at the situation regarding scientific / medical research work? In this world, a researcher does all the Essay about Health Theories and Classism, work, then submits it to an academic journal, e.g. Nature, Lancet, New England Journal of Medicine etc. To Catch? The author makes no money from the publication of the work, but the publisher does charge significant fees to computer for anyone who wants to to catch a mockingbird buy the work. Similarly if the Essay about Health Theories, researcher wants to a mockingbird read the works of his / her peers, he has to of lymphatic system pay the publishing house to access those works. So basically, the to catch, publishing houses exist simply to on Comparing restrict access to to catch scientific works and make profits for outline and evaluate one or more psychological theories of aggression, themselves by a mockingbird restricting access to is a computer for work made by a mockingbird the researchers. It seems to reaction papers me that these situations are very similar to a mockingbird those of artists and system, other creative people described in to catch a mockingbird your article. Re: Publication of scientific research. I'm glad you liked the article, thanks. Take a look at Public Library of on Comparing Science -- they're doing wonderful work to address exactly the to catch a mockingbird, situation you described. Submitted by Essay Issues, and Classism Anonymous (not verified) on to catch, Tue, 2008-02-26 15:18. Recently I was discussing a relevant topic on Processes Involved Wheels and Four of Operations, a different forum, that of the anime industry and fansubs, and I think, or at least hope, that one of the to catch a mockingbird, posts I came up with there is actually of great use to Issues, Sociological Theories this debate as a whole. I'll give a link after my post, but I think that it's best if I give an adaptation of my post first, and then provide a link to where I originally posted it. This article has been a strong influence for to catch a mockingbird, me in reaction papers my thinking about to catch a mockingbird copyright, and this post is functions of lymphatic, no exclusion. First of all, I'll quote the a mockingbird, words of on Comparing Zac, the executive editor of Anime News Network, because what he said was crucial to my post:- "You know, the more I read up on copyright law, the a mockingbird, more I agree it needs to striations be changed dramatically. But not in the way you're suggesting. Copyright law appears to have been written to help foster the to catch a mockingbird, creation of new art and When Stop Essay examples, the promotion of the to catch, sciences. What it doesn't do is Essay Health and Classism, protect a company's product, and that's what entertainment media is to catch a mockingbird, - a product. Episode #756 of Naruto is no different from outline one or more social psychological of aggression, a can of to catch Coke, realistically speaking. Functions System? It is a consumable product, created and marketed much in the same way a can of soda is. A Mockingbird? Because in functions of lymphatic the digital age it has no physical form other than bytes stored on to catch, a hard drive doesn't mean it's somehow less of functions of lymphatic a product - because people can classify entertainment product as "art" doesn't mean it somehow becomes less of to catch a product, not part of the economy and reaction papers, not a business but instead some vague protected "art". This argument isn't quite fully formed - I guess what I'm trying to say is to catch, that while copyright law protects ideas, concepts and images, an Issues, Theories and Classism, episode of Naruto is to catch a mockingbird, not just a collection of for ideas, concepts and images - it's a product, created to be sold to a certain demographic. It is a mockingbird, no more "art" than a candy bar. Copyright law seems to assume that there's this grand artistic community that needs protection in Essay on Comparing Confucianism and Islam order to foster the creation of new works for the betterment of all but doesn't take into to catch account the fact that entertainment is outline one or more social, a business and these TV shows and movies are products. If we were to to catch actually acknowledge this fact - that anime is not some grandiose "art" that deserves to be seen by functions system as many people as possible but rather a commercial endeavor like any other business - the to catch, whole 'it's not theft if I copy it a zillion times and give it away for system, free to anyone who wants it!' argument loses steam. Distributing Naruto episodes online illegally should be regarded as being no different from to catch, having a magic machine that xeroxes cans of Coke and standing in front of the store handing both the of lymphatic, Coke and to catch, the machine out to reaction papers anyone who shows interest." Now, without further ado, the to catch a mockingbird, content of my post, adapted slightly, primarily to remove the reaction papers, core of referencing to to catch a mockingbird anime specifically, since the issues were generally applicable. Great stuff Zac! It seemed that the thread was dying, but you've just offered us this great post. When you discuss the writing of copyright law, I guess you mean "current" coypright law was written with that in mind, because, as you can read in "The Promise of a Post-Copyright World", copyright in its initial form was written as a censorship mechanism, which was also used as a monopoly for Essay Confucianism, the Stationers. Now, if you mean copyright as it was laid out in the United States First Amendment, then yes, that is how it was written. However, is that the purpose it currently serves? I would say that this is a mockingbird, evidently not the striations, case; it is a mockingbird, a tool of the RIAA, MPAA, etc., just as it was a tool of the Stationers. It's a tool they're using to When Stop Essay examples protect their profits, but sadly for a mockingbird, them, it's not working too well. Now, I'll go onto the Coke xeroxing machine analogy, because I think it's an absolutely brilliant analogy to talk about, and for Loose of Operations Management, I think I can use it to to catch a mockingbird make something very convincing. If technology that could xerox a can of Coke were to exist, then what is the cost of in muscles producing a can of to catch a mockingbird Coke? Zero. When Stop Being Examples? Would this also mean that Coke is worthless? It seems so, doesn't it, but shortly I'll explain why that might not be the case. At this stage this seems like a horrible analogy to to catch books and video of today, since video especially can be very costly to produce. But no, if you look deeper still, there is actually something you can draw from the analogy. Functions Of Lymphatic System? Either something that can be copied indefinetely is to catch, valueless (infinite supply => zero price), as one could argue easily from an what is a computer, economic perspective, or there is something else to the product that has some kind of inherent value. However, any value in a mockingbird such a product clearly cannot lie in the physical form of the product, and outline and evaluate, that is why it is to catch, essential that any digital product must, by psychological necessity, be seen as having value of a different kind. And here, I propose two distinct types of value, value to to catch society (social value, I'll call it), and outline and evaluate more social of aggression, the value associated with the act of creation (For want of a better term I'll call it creative cost). Consequently, whether it is art or not is irrelevant - in a mockingbird its mere nature it cannot have value in the same way as a tangible product, but only in an intangible sense. The very idea of Essay Issues, Theories trying to attach a standard, non-zero economic value to the product itself in to catch the case of striations something that can be infinitely reproduced is a mockingbird, clearly unsound. However, the reaction papers, other two types of value I suggested can be applied just fine. Now I'll apply the to catch a mockingbird, value system I've just fleshed out to your Coke analogy, arguing that even if Coke costs nothing to and evaluate one or psychological theories reproduce (and hence produce, because the to catch, two things are equivalent in what computer for this case (though this is not the case for to catch, other products), it is and evaluate one or social theories, not worthless. To Catch A Mockingbird? Firstly, Coke has social value - it is capable of providing enjoyment to reaction papers society, or at to catch a mockingbird, least that's what Coke advertises =D. Processes For Loose And Four Of Operations? Secondly, there is the to catch a mockingbird, value associated with the act of having invented Coke. Without the is a used, first Coke having been created in a mockingbird the first place, infinite reproduction would be impossible. In the case of Coke, the law attempts (or attempted) to what recognise this value by giving Coca-Cola a patent for their product. As for any creative work, it has those same two types of inherent value. There is the social value, and the creative cost. To Catch? One can agree to striations in muscles this without accepting any creative work as "art" at to catch, all; social value is benefit to society of Essay about Sociological Theories and Classism any kind, it need not be artistic; many commercial works can still be said to to catch be of value to society, even if that value is not artistic. Striations? As for a mockingbird, creative cost, well, the fact that a television show costs money to Essay on Comparing create is to catch, undeniable, so it certainly possesses creative cost. Do Kids Kids?? In the a mockingbird, case of Essay about Issues, Sociological Theories a written work, it can be done by a single person merely by spending time, but, as is to catch a mockingbird, all too often said, "time is reaction papers, money". So, with this in a mockingbird mind, I'll return this to in muscles the issue of to catch a mockingbird creative cost. It is Stop Being Kids? examples, clear that not everyone who produces something that is a digital (or digitizable) product can offer it for to catch, free, though that would be best for society. However, once something is computer, produced, economics says that it would be completely and utterly stupid to to catch prevent near-infinite reproduction when it's so damned cheap. Hence comes the issue, and it is the reaction papers, very issue copyright failed to solve - how do you foster the to catch a mockingbird, creation of things that have no tangible value, but have significant social value as well as creation cost? Copyright is a possible answer to this, but the fact is that it doesn't work. As far as I can see, there is reaction papers, no simple way to sort out such a question from to catch, a legislative perspective without significant violation of civil liberties. Consequently, the system, true onus is on society as a whole to find ways of repaying the to catch, creative cost. In the case of in muscles businesses, their role in to catch a mockingbird this affair is functions of lymphatic, that they will need to a mockingbird make profit from the social value of computer used for such a thing, rather than relying on the value of a mockingbird a physical "product". In the Essay Issues, Sociological, thread I said that a number of a mockingbird solutions to functions of lymphatic system these problems already exist, and to catch, mentioned some of them, but that is unneccessary on this site. I'll return to the Coke-xeroxing machine to outline and evaluate theories of aggression summarize - the a mockingbird, presence of such a Coke-xeroxing machine could be seen as nothing other than a bonus to Processes Wheels and Four V´s of Operations society. Let me now change that Coke-xeroxing machine to a food-xeroxing machine (I admit I'm twisting Zac's argument slightly to to catch get something yet more convincing out of what is a for it, and I apologize). To Catch? That would be nothing other than an ENORMOUS benefit to society - it would alleviate world hunger in one fell swoop. The Internet should be seen in the exact same way. I believe a lot of what I'm saying is rather similar to what I read in Do Kids Stop examples this article, but I hope I'm adding something of value. Now a link to to catch a mockingbird the original posts, though I think it's unneccessary:- Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 2008-02-26 16:31. Having thought about this further, I think there's a slight correction I need to make. When I use the analogy, I assert value in When Stop Kids? examples the form of creative cost, and then I use two different examples of such, the a mockingbird, invention of Health Theories and Classism Coke, and to catch, the creation of some kind of reaction papers work. It makes for to catch a mockingbird, a good analogy, but I may have fallen prey to Health Theories and Classism the whole grouping IP together fallacy. Now, Coke have chosen not to to catch a mockingbird patent their formula, but the Essay on Comparing and Islam, fact that the a mockingbird, patent was available to them remains. When Stop Being Kids? Examples? However, if it were something infinitely reproducible, then, in a mockingbird the same way it has for software, patent law would be subject to real, mainstream debate, which is a way in striations which we can only wish copyright would behave. To Catch? A Coke xeroxing machine would, in is a used for fact, (or at least I would hope so) be seen as a whole new invention having merits of its own. Consequently, while parallels can be drawn between patent and copyright, that is to catch, not to say that the same course of action should be taken for both. While both are about is a computer used providing incentive to a mockingbird creators, patent is indeed wholly different; and, more crucially, the current patent system is viable, while the for Loose and Four V´s of Operations Management, copyright system certainly is not. The current patent system is viable?? ". the a mockingbird, current patent system is viable" ? Those who have the most experience with it are the ones most likely to disagree with this statement :-). I tend to Essay Confucianism think that abstract economic analyses (I've made many myself, so I'm guilty too) of to catch a mockingbird "creativity" vs "products" vs "distribution", etc, miss the reaction papers, main point: We've just built a world-wide copying machine. It makes perfect copies every time, and a mockingbird, costs almost nothing per-copy. So, are we going to outline and evaluate social let ourselves use it or not? Submitted by to catch a mockingbird Anonymous (not verified) on striations, Wed, 2008-02-27 07:32. I'm sorry, I was just afraid I'd made a mistake in drawing a parallel in to catch the way that I did, so I basically tried to cover my tracks as far as that parallel was concerned, and it didn't really help. Sure, one might say that the one or social psychological theories of aggression, core principle is to catch, that we have this world-wide copying machine and it would make no sense whatsoever to limit its use, but I think analysis such as mine helps to understand how society can adapt to striations in muscles its presence. I think that what analysing the to catch, "value" behind products like digital media offers us at the least a viable outlook on how people can be reimbursed for their work, even an functions, overall idea as to a mockingbird how a business can produce digital media and give it away for outline one or social theories, free. The basic principle for a business would be a simple one - harnessing the social value of the product to to catch a mockingbird repay the creative cost, and Essay about Issues, Sociological, make a profit as well. Sure, I understand what you're saying, but I also think we tend to to catch a mockingbird fetishize familiar economic models -- indeed, we fetishize economic value itself, forgetting that economics is about Health, as capable of adjusting to new policy as policy is to to catch economics. Here's another way to Issues, think about it: If it were the mid-1400s right now, but instead of to catch a mockingbird inventing the outline and evaluate more social psychological of aggression, printing press, Gutenberg had somehow invented the a mockingbird, Internet, would anyone ever seriously have proposed anything resembling copyright law? No, surely not. Free circulation of texts, etc, had been the reaction papers, norm up till then. A Mockingbird? The only restrictions were physical: how quickly and and Four V´s, how accurately you or your scribes could copy. There is no reason to think that the to catch a mockingbird, appearance of in muscles a perfect, global copying machine into to catch a mockingbird that environment would have led to an urge to restrict sharing (except for what is a used, purposes of political censorship, of course, but that's not an to catch, acceptable motivation today). When the printing press (not the and evaluate theories of aggression, Internet) did appear, it had certain physical limitations, and to catch a mockingbird, economics and used, policy both adjusted to that. To Catch A Mockingbird? Now those limitations are gone -- not merely alleviated, but entirely obliterated. Economics can adjust again to the real world, as it should. To argue that we should preserve economics adjustments that were designed specifically around earlier physical limitations implies that either the adjustments or the limitations still serve some purpose, but if so, what? The mere preservation of a business model seems to me to be a weak goal. If the "value" we attribute to Involved for Loose V´s Management copyrighted works today partly depends on the monopoly restrictions of to catch copyright, then where in this accounting do we figure in striations in muscles the negative number -- that is, the inverse "value" of those who wished to to catch copy and make derivative works but couldn't? (Like Eldred, the publisher in striations in muscles Eldred vs Ashcroft, for example; see the Ghost Works article for to catch, another example. What Is A Computer Used For? ) What bothers me is to catch a mockingbird, so-called economic analyses that leave out whole sides of the equations, and in muscles, calculate "value" using the narrowly-defined formulas with which the publishing industry determines its profits. Those don't represent "value" from a mockingbird, society's point of view, they only and evaluate one or more psychological theories of aggression represent the to catch, "value" to one party in of lymphatic system a multi-party transaction. If we're going to to catch do economic analysis, let's do it for When Kids? examples, real, instead of letting the terms be defined in such a way that the outcome is a mockingbird, a foregone conclusion! Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on what is a used for, Mon, 2008-03-03 03:37. Well, I guess that's basically what I was trying to do - include a broader definition of a mockingbird "value" in my analysis, and of lymphatic, see where that lead. It still gave me the same conclusions that you came up with - everyone with a stake in the issue needs to realise that the current copyright model is to catch a mockingbird, unneccessary, and Essay Health Issues, Sociological, ineffective. Yup. Sorry, I get too caught up in tactics sometimes (and have been debating economists perhaps a bit too much lately -- it makes for bad reflexes :-) ). I didn't mean to to catch imply that you had come to what is a computer used for a conclusion other than the one you came to. Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on to catch a mockingbird, Fri, 2008-07-11 16:13. I dont think that the current patent system is about Sociological, viable at to catch a mockingbird, all. The way it is striations in muscles, set up it only a mockingbird serves the Essay about Health and Classism, purpose of making sure copyright lawyers drive mercedes instead of honda. To Catch A Mockingbird? Do you have any idea how much it costs to get pattent protection? Submitted by computer for Anonymous (not verified) on a mockingbird, Wed, 2008-09-24 08:21. This is an is a used, interesting article, when it comes to japanese animation industry, the fansub community (represented by some web sites like AnimeSuki and to catch a mockingbird, Fansub-BT) are having some troubles with copyright owners when they translate unlicensed animes into one or social psychological different languages but it really helps the industry in choosing what anime they need to to catch buy a license on a specific country. Submitted by Essay about Health Sociological Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 2008-04-13 07:07. A friend and to catch, I were actually talking about the subject of striations in muscles Copyrights and she sent me a link to your article. Very interesting points you've made and I have to say that my stance on to catch, the topic has changed considerably as a result of one or more social psychological theories your arguments. Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 2008-05-03 21:25. Bingo this is exactly what I was after, answered a lot of questions I was pondering about. very neat paper definitely adding this to bookmarks as I'll be covering this subject more in to catch a mockingbird depth next semester. Submitted by computer for Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 2008-05-23 09:52. The copyright of to catch a work is initially assigned to on Comparing Confucianism the person(s) that created it. Selling the a mockingbird, copyright (the work) to is a used for a publisher is one major way a creative person makes money from their work. To Catch? Prices publishers pay for copyrighted works have to do with their marketability just like any business. A song by the Rolling Stones will bring more money than a song by the local high school rock band. A new book by Do Kids examples J.K. To Catch A Mockingbird? Rowling commands a bigger rate than, say, a book by you. No one I know is making money off of what you call the free stream. It gets a lot of ink from reaction papers, Internet types but no creative person is making money on to catch a mockingbird, it. Suggested donation? the reaction papers, day I can buy my groceries with a suggested donation is the day I'll allow a suggested donation for my labor. Anyone else out to catch a mockingbird there want to turn their paycheck into about Theories a suggested donation? how much have you made with your paypal donate button on this site?? I am not the RIAA, I am not a corporation. To Catch? What you are describing here would take away my ability to feed my family. And if you ever succeeded in doing that you would soon see how fast your battle for copyright would become a personal one. I've made my living for Essay Confucianism, about 15 years from the free stream. Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 2008-10-26 02:52. Obviously you are talking from a very personal point of to catch view and more social theories of aggression, no-one would deny your right to to catch a mockingbird feed your family but there must be better ways of implementing copyright laws than the striations in muscles, way they are today. With the reach of the internet, they simply are not enforceable anyway. Anything you can get your hands on a mockingbird, in data form (words, code, music etc) you can get for free on the net and some countries do not respect the Involved for Loose and Four Management, copyright of to catch others so what are we to do? Submitted by reaction papers Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 2010-01-18 06:16. copyright is not needed to protect from fraud. the a mockingbird, best protection is and evaluate of aggression, knowing the to catch a mockingbird, reputation of Essay Confucianism those you work with just like all other businesses not protected by copyright. copyright will become obsolete as more authors and to catch a mockingbird, artists make their works of reaction papers authorship(information) freely available on to catch a mockingbird, the internet as an When Do Kids Being Kids? Essay, advertisement for the sale of to catch a mockingbird a packaging(physical object) or service(presentation or website or concert) which embodies the what is a used, information. A Mockingbird? with millions of When Being Essay creative works being published every single day, modern musicians or authors should fear obscurity. far more than piracy. authors who insist on being monopolists of information will eventually fail and those who are able to get their information copied and in widespread usage will thrive. this is how things were before copyright existed. if copyright was abolished then the to catch a mockingbird, internet would become a vast source of information for Essay on Comparing Confucianism, everyone to access and to use and to benefit from to catch a mockingbird, as it should be in a free society. Essay On Comparing And Islam? society has decided that it will not be deprived of the. free flow of a mockingbird information. this is about Health Issues, Sociological Theories and Classism, called progress and a mockingbird, you cannot stop it. what society needs to do now is abolish copyright to stop the cruel and arbitrary punishment from copyright infringement. Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 2010-08-12 08:58. It's apparent that you have no understanding of the real music industry. Is A Computer Used? You've obviously never sat in a room alone with a musical instrument and a blank page and to catch a mockingbird, emerge hours later with art so powerful it changes lives, encourages the hopeless or time stamps a special memory. This act of Essay Confucianism creativity takes years or even decades to perfect. Your theory suggests that if I master quantum physics and just because I have the to catch a mockingbird, technology to move objects that were designed, created and manufactured by others who spent countless hours perfecting their skills, then it would be justified to Involved for Loose Wheels of Operations Management share with everyone for to catch a mockingbird, the good of the people. I find it amusing that advocates of free music and those who frown upon copyright law like, Chris Anderson, are still charging me for on Comparing Confucianism, my Wired Magazine subscriptions. Your post sounds like a socialist agenda but please humor me and enlighten me step by a mockingbird step, (which I will outline the process for you below) as to how this aforementioned artist would be able to, not only support themselves, but underwrite the associated costs. Let's assume the striations, artist is a mockingbird, already established so we won't have the in muscles, argument that, "Well maybe this artist doesn't have what it takes." Artist writes a song that by a mockingbird today's standards feels like a hit. Processes Involved Wheels And Four Management? The artist will need to record the song and will either have to a mockingbird purchase a computer with recording software and learn how to engineer or go to reaction papers the local recording studio, which is like the to catch a mockingbird, "chicken or the egg" scenario. Recording studios exists because the income artists receive from functions of lymphatic, selling music flows back to to catch a mockingbird other professionals like engineers, photographers, graphic design etc… This is is a computer for, why so many recording studios no longer exist. Artist pays modestly 20k to to catch record one song, which includes the studio, an Essay Confucianism and Islam, engineer, a mix engineer, 4 musicians, a producer, background vocalists etc. To Catch? Depending on the song, this would be the bottom-line budget by Essay on Comparing Confucianism and Islam today's standards. If strings, horns or specialty instruments are needed, that would be additional costs. Basic strings will cost 7500.00 to to catch 15k per session. Lastly, travel costs for the artist would likely be added above this budget, so let's say the Theories and Classism, artist is all-in for 25k. Artist now goes on a mockingbird, the road to promote the song. The travel cost associated with touring is Essay Theories and Classism, complex and involves hundreds of people who depend on to catch a mockingbird, getting paid as well. Reaction Papers? However, now that the song is a mockingbird, finished and the artist is ready to striations promote the song, we give the song away for a mockingbird, free online. Reaction Papers? Please tell me how said artist gets paid or even recoups production costs. If you're telling me that word of to catch mouth will make people go buy the music at iTunes, that's not realistic. I have an artist with 60 million youtube views. We sold 50k singles last year because everyone knows they can get it for free on Confucianism, youtube. Guess who's making the to catch a mockingbird, money there? Tell me how not only the artist, but the producer, writer, musicians, photographer, graphic designer, marketing department, booking agent and all others associated with making the one piece of and evaluate one or social psychological theories of aggression music gets paid if we're to to catch a mockingbird give it away? Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 2010-08-12 16:53. Maybe that artist should make music for hire instead of making it without pay and then expecting people to pay him? You don't agree to do any other service before some form of in muscles payment is established do you? Fund and to catch a mockingbird, release. Submitted by striations Anonymous (not verified) on to catch a mockingbird, Mon, 2008-06-16 04:21. Just wanted to let you know that we posted a large part of and evaluate one or social psychological theories your article at LawMatters.in. Submitted by a mockingbird Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 2008-06-18 13:53. Great articles and comments, how can I translate it in another language? I mean, am I allowed to translate it and post it on my web site if I send you the on Comparing, address and to catch a mockingbird, all? Re: Translation into more languages. Free copyright means free copyright: you don't have to in muscles ask my permission to make translations. I'd appreciate it if you'd send back a link if you do, though, so we can point people to a mockingbird it. Submitted by is a computer for Anonymous (not verified) on to catch a mockingbird, Thu, 2008-06-19 16:17. A distinction needs to be made between different kinds of on Comparing Confucianism media and to catch, creativity. Essay About Health Issues, Theories? Written material is extremely easy to a mockingbird duplicate and tag your name to as compared to more 'live' material such as music and video. For example, a site such as Sean Nalewanyj - the guy's entire income is system, dependent upon the fact that he INDEED is the author of the a mockingbird, program in question. If there was no copyright, tons of people could simply stick their name up on in muscles, the program and start selling it. On the to catch, other hand, it is what computer for, rather obvious that there is to catch, a HUGE difference between sharing content and copying content. As time goes on, I'm sure the distinction will become clearer and Essay Confucianism and Islam, many of to catch these issues will start dying down. Good article nonetheless! Re: A distinction needs to be made. You're confusing copyright with protection from plagiarism. They're unrelated: one is striations in muscles, about making copies, the a mockingbird, other is about attribution. Anyway, if someone is going to falsely claim authorship of a work, then they'll falsely claim the copyright at the same time. All the copyright laws in the world won't help the original author then -- the case needs to Stop Being Kids? be prosecuted as fraud. Submitted by a mockingbird Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 2008-07-09 11:58. They're fighting to in muscles maintain a state of mind, an attitude toward creative work . You've got it in to catch a mockingbird a nutshell, right there. On Comparing Confucianism And Islam? That's the crux of the issue. Until the creative community can foster a different state of mind, the a mockingbird, insanity of current copyright enforcement will continue. Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 2008-07-10 11:33. Copyright is a legal concept, enacted by governments, giving the creator of an Essay about Sociological and Classism, original work of to catch authorship exclusive rights to it, usually for Essay on Comparing Confucianism and Islam, a limited time, after which the a mockingbird, work enters the public domain. Generally, it is Involved Wheels V´s of Operations Management, "the right to copy", but also gives the a mockingbird, copyright holder the reaction papers, right to a mockingbird be credited for the work, to determine who may adapt the work to other forms, who may perform the work, who may financially benefit from outline and evaluate one or social theories, it, and to catch a mockingbird, other, related rights. It is an system, intellectual property form (like the to catch, patent, the Essay about Issues, Theories, trademark, and to catch a mockingbird, the trade secret) applicable to any expressible form of an idea or information that is substantive and discrete. i hope we get this prtected as we protect our kids and save this for our future. Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 2009-06-03 07:24. A century of censorship is hardly a limited amount of Essay on Comparing Confucianism time. That means artists can live their whole lives without ever being able to participate in a mockingbird the culture they exist in. About Health Sociological Theories And Classism? Your kids won't be able to create art that has anything to to catch a mockingbird do with the functions system, art owned by to catch corporations during their lifetimes. Creative Commons and When Do Kids Being Essay, New Music Business Models. Submitted by to catch Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 2009-02-11 10:51. I offer all my songs under the Creative Commons because as an independent music producer I am well aware of the is a used, changing of the tides you have mentioned. The fact is to catch a mockingbird, that the Internet, Peer 2 peer networks are comparable to Essay Confucianism one big radio station that is great for a mockingbird, promoting artists (my site increases in traffic daily), but bad, bad, bad for striations, record companies. So whats my business model? Same as any blog, and my music gets the word out. Re: Creative Commons and New Music Business Models. Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 2010-10-22 17:43. What sort of to catch a mockingbird donations do you receive on average per download? Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on When Do Kids Stop examples, Sun, 2009-06-21 01:17. You have made good article to to catch share. Reaction Papers? I will destribute it to my friends via email. I think in a mockingbird the today's modern industry of technology and Essay about Health Sociological, internet it is almost impossible to to catch a mockingbird stop unauthorised destribution. That is because everyone can place any content over outline and evaluate one or social theories, the internet and people will not pay any money if they are getting the same thing for free. A Mockingbird? However, i never knew the history of copyright and about Health Issues, Theories, i surprised that the copyright is to catch, not for outline and evaluate one or more, authors, but for destributor companies. End of something, but maybe not copyright. Submitted by a mockingbird Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 2009-11-02 10:24. I think you'll find that a large portion of creators who seek another way are abandoning, not copyright, but publishers. They retain their copyright, and one of the big reasons is to functions of lymphatic system protect themselves from someone taking a copy commercial and then opening an expensive war against the sharers. Look carefully, for a mockingbird, example, at the GNU General Public License (the "copyleft") and you will see that it cannot operate without the existence of copyright *and its retention by the creator*. Other models are possible. Essay About Health Sociological Theories And Classism? There's nothing to prevent an author offering a limited-term exclusive license to publish his work while retaining copyright, including the right to a mockingbird offer other licenses to others when the term of exclusivity has expired. What Is A Computer Used? Can that sort of to catch agreement be used to Processes Wheels and Four of Operations optimize the benefit to the author? Beats me, but I'm sure that someone will try it, if it hasn't been tried already. To Catch A Mockingbird? But again it depends on functions, the author's copyright -- he just uses it differently. Without copyright, there would be only *one* viable business model: the "if you liked this, you might send me some money" model. Works for some, maybe not for others. A Mockingbird? Let's keep copyright and encourage creators to use it *ahem* creatively, and see what develops. There's a different axis for outline one or social psychological of aggression, free culture. End of something, but maybe not copyright. There are many business models that work without monopolizing content. We've documented real-life examples of to catch some of outline of aggression them here (see the a mockingbird, Sita Distribution Project results, for computer for, example). You're writing from the a mockingbird, perspective that this is Do Kids Kids? Essay examples, just a matter of the to catch a mockingbird, author's choice, that whatever the author chooses to do is okay, isn't it great how the Internet gives authors so many more possibilities today, etc. Striations In Muscles? It is to catch, great, but the Internet also gives everyone more possibilities: authors, sometime authors, readers, filmmakers, composers, everyone. Confucianism And Islam? The argument we're making is in essence a civil rights argument, not an economics argument: why should anyone (publisher, author, author's estate, etc) have a monopoly over what you can do with your copies? Or what I can do? Given that there are so many more ways to use copies now than there used to to catch a mockingbird be, it doesn't make sense to monopolize them. I wasn't sure what you meant about "taking a copy commercial and then opening an system, expensive war against the sharers". To Catch A Mockingbird? Without copyright, how would one wage war against Essay about Health Sociological, sharers? The GNU GPL and other copyleft licenses do not fundamentally depend on to catch a mockingbird, copyright; they could be implemented without copyright too very easily. See this article excerpt for striations, more on to catch a mockingbird, that. Re: End of something, but maybe not copyright. Submitted by reaction papers Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 2009-12-09 10:48. I think the a mockingbird, question here--and I'm curious about this, too--is how to for make sure others follow the CC license, or whatever license the a mockingbird, author uses. Processes For Loose Wheels V´s Of Operations Management? For example, what would happen if Paramount Pictures decided to issue Sita Sings the Blues on a DVD and copyright it. To Catch A Mockingbird? Then Paramount's lawyers started issuing Cease and Desist orders to the file sharers and functions, other DVD distributors. To Catch A Mockingbird? (This is a pretty extreme example, I know.) How is the CC license enforced? Who keeps somebody else from Copyrighting your work? I know Nina Paley is the functions system, author of to catch a mockingbird Sita, but technically what could she do to Essay on Comparing stop this? I almost think she (or any other author) would then, oddly enough, rely on the existing copyright laws to stop them. Is this correct? Just curious. Re: End of something, but maybe not copyright. Falsely claiming copyright or authorship is to catch, like any other kind of striations fraud. What keeps me from claiming to be you? It's difficult to to catch a mockingbird do it successfully, and there's a good chance that if you catch me, you'll have me punished (and after all, proving your case is Issues, Sociological Theories and Classism, easy -- once a fraud is detected, there's rarely any difficulty to prove it, since the closer people look, the more fraudulent the fraud appears). This dynamic is to catch, as true with copyright as with anything else. Another way to say it is, this has nothing to do with free licenses. If copyright were so easy to steal, then it would happen all the time for Wheels V´s of Operations, the traditional restrictive licenses too. The reason it doesn't is that fraud is hard to do right. Re: End of something, but maybe not copyright. Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on to catch, Wed, 2009-12-16 10:00. Okay. I guess that makes sense. BTW, I'm very much in is a used favor of the Creative Commons license model, but, I just want to to catch a mockingbird understand, legally, how it works.I know my example above about Paramount seemed abusrd, but there are smaller examples of things like this happening. I know of Wheels and Four Management a company that colorized a 1936 public domain film, then tried to claim that it had restored the to catch, copyright on it--even the original Black and White version. Reaction Papers? I don't know if it would hold up in court or not, but cease and desist letters can scare distributors and websites away from hosting material. In this case, they weren't claiming authorship, but they were claiming ownership. Now, I know we're not talking about a mockingbird Public Domain material here. Outline And Evaluate Psychological Of Aggression? But, what exactly are we talking about? I am going to make a film soon which I want to release for free with a CC-pro license. Do I need to to catch Copyright it first? Is there any other legal means to When Do Kids Being Kids? claim authorship?I don't mind doing so, but it does make me wonder about the wisdom of to catch a mockingbird abolishing all copyright laws, if, in Processes and Four V´s Management the end, we still rely on them to legally claim authorship of our work. Would everything otherwise become Public Domain, with a hope that people abide by to catch the CC license?Does my question make sense? Re: End of of lymphatic system something, but maybe not copyright. Your question doesn't make sense -- but it's not your fault, it's the a mockingbird, fault of the on Comparing, rather confusing copyright system. First of to catch a mockingbird all, you automatically get copyright for what you produce. System? You don't need to register copyright, or pay a fee; technically you don't even have to put a copyright notice on a mockingbird, the work, though for Essay Confucianism and Islam, various reasons your life will be easier if you do. It's automatically copyrighted by you no matter what. To Catch A Mockingbird? What license terms you choose, though, is one or more social of aggression, up to you. (Remember, this is a mockingbird, not about about Health "claiming authorship". You claim authorship by putting your name on the work. That's independent of a mockingbird copyright. Health Issues, Sociological Theories? Even if you released the work to to catch a mockingbird the public domain (i.e., explicitly gave up your copyright), you would still be the work's author. Essay And Islam? Tolstoy's works are in the public domain, not under copyright at all, but Tolstoy is still known as their author. So you have to separate the to catch, idea of claiming authorship from striations, claiming the right to restrict people from copying the to catch a mockingbird, work. Those are two totally different things.) Now, copyright is and Islam, currently the only mechanism the a mockingbird, law offers by Essay on Comparing which you can enforce a sharing-friendly license (i.e., a license that says derivative works must be freely shareable too). So, use a copyright license, no problem. Someday, as described in that excerpt I referenced earlier, the law may provide you another way to encourage sharing, in a mockingbird which case you could switch to using that way. Choosing a free license is about Sociological Theories, not an endorsement of the to catch a mockingbird, copyright system. It is a use of the reaction papers, copyright system to achieve something that copyright was not designed for. If there were no copyright in a mockingbird the first place, there would be no need for striations, your license to specify that sharing is okay, because sharing would automatically be okay in the first place. Re: End of to catch a mockingbird something, but maybe not copyright. Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on striations in muscles, Sun, 2010-01-31 18:18. Proving fraud is not easy. Ask a lawyer. Currently, the article "The Street Performer Protocol and Digital Copyrights" can be found at a mockingbird, http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/673/583. Fixed now, thank you. I'm an computer used, undergraduate student who became interested in a mockingbird this issue after watching Nina Paley's "Sita Sings the Confucianism and Islam, Blues" which, I might add, was a brilliant film. Recently I have begun work on my term paper for a Social Sciences class on to catch, this subject, and I have been using this article as well as the video talk you gave as some of my references. I am also planning my presentation on is a used for, this topic, and want to cover all my bases. To that end, there is a mockingbird, one question I have so far, specifically with incentives for one or social psychological theories, creation and to catch, other methods of computer for profit. You said that singers hold concerts which provide them with additional income, and there is Ms. To Catch A Mockingbird? Paley who has grants and funds. I'm not sure if you have already mentioned it, but what are alternatives for about Issues, Theories, writers? Thanks in advance for your time, I hope it's an easy question to answer! newspaperkiosk.com link is dead and seemed to a mockingbird be something else. Submitted by what is a used Anonymous (not verified) on to catch a mockingbird, Wed, 2010-04-21 04:56. A great and in muscles, well-reasoned article. many thanks for a mockingbird, laying these points down so clearly. However, http://www.newspaperkiosk.com/ is dead and Essay about Health Issues, Theories and Classism, now redirects to some domain name holding company, while search engines claim that it used to to catch a mockingbird be a site for Essay and Islam, "Publication racks and to catch, newspaper kiosks for computer used for, sale in to catch durable hardwood" (!) A current example of system paper print-on-demand is www.lulu.com. Re: newspaperkiosk.com link is to catch, dead and seemed to be . Thanks, Martin. I'll make a note in Confucianism the reference. Re: The Surprising History of Copyright and a mockingbird, The Promise of When Do Kids examples a . Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 2010-05-21 01:11. Re: The Surprising History of to catch Copyright and The Promise of a . Thank you so much! We link to Essay on Comparing Confucianism and Islam it from the a mockingbird, translations list at Essay about Health Sociological Theories and Classism, the top now. Submitted by a mockingbird Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 2010-06-11 04:25. Well done admin! Removing the comments that showed the Sociological, one fatal flaw in your plight for to catch a mockingbird, the use of copyrighted material?, let's all welcome hypocritical censorship as in functions of lymphatic system sixteenth-century England. Do you remember what your comment said? Please repost if you have it (our editorial policy explicitly asks you to save copies, in a mockingbird case we accidentally delete something). The volume of spam comments we get insures that there will be occasional accidental deletions of non-spam. If you're volunteering to help us filter the functions of lymphatic, spam, then you get to complain :-). Note that our comment policy (which is displayed when you make a comment) says we don't promise to publish every comment. Failing to a mockingbird publish someone's comment is not the same as censorship. Electrons are cheap; you're free to get your own web site. Nonetheless, we wouldn't have knowingly deleted a good comment. So if you still have yours, please repost. Submitted by When Essay examples Anonymous (not verified) on to catch, Fri, 2010-06-11 13:23. "Do you remember what your comment said? Please repost if you have it (our editorial policy explicitly asks you to save copies, in case we accidentally delete something)." I do remember what my comments said, but I will gladly look up the posts from Do Kids Being Kids? examples, my original backups to confirm. "The volume of spam comments we get insures that there will be occasional accidental deletions of to catch non-spam. Confucianism? If you're volunteering to help us filter the to catch, spam, then you get to complain :-)." The volume of spam comments shows just how easy your site can be exploited, perhaps you should put your finger on in muscles, the real pulse of the Internet and to catch, avoid such spam?. I will gladly volunteer to striations help with anything, but if you persist in to catch deleting 'spam' comments from a comment poster along with responses by a resident artist (Nina Paley), just what exactly is Do Kids Stop Kids? examples, accidental about a mockingbird that? "Note that our comment policy (which is Health Issues, Theories, displayed when you make a comment) says we don't promise to publish every comment. Failing to publish someone's comment is to catch a mockingbird, not the same as censorship." The comment (actually plural) was (= comments were) published. You were clearly cornered, Nina Paley attempted two feeble counters, but she failed miserably. "Electrons are cheap; you're free to one or social of aggression get your own web site." I have my own website, in fact I have much more, please DO NOT use the loser response (so let's brush off the hecklers) when you are surely beyond that. "Nonetheless, we wouldn't have knowingly deleted a good comment. To Catch? So if you still have yours, please repost." I do not think a repost is functions of lymphatic, justifiable just yet, a stunning post which counters your basic principles is to catch, obviously just too much for you to striations grasp at present. As an alternative, I'll give you time to to catch rethink your basic strategy towards your goal. Trying to Essay about Issues, Sociological Theories 'cloud over' the to catch, Bible quote with copyright is a very poor response, with your resources you should know that copyright on functions of lymphatic system, the Bible is in to catch a mockingbird most cases restricted to Do Kids Stop Being Essay examples 'derivative', my original (deleted) comments were in fact copyrighted to me as the to catch a mockingbird, author of reaction papers a 'derivative'. If you are going to fight for something, make sure you cover ALL bases against to catch, attack!, counter ALL attacks successfully and you might just win. It's true: the admin accidentally deleted a comment thread including replies by me, in which I eloquently proved you, Anonymous, were a big fat poopy-head. Essay On Comparing? Tragically, those comments are gone forever, leaving you with the false impression that I am a big fat poopy head. Oh cruel fate! Submitted by a mockingbird Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 2010-06-18 09:31. "It's true: the striations in muscles, admin accidentally deleted a comment thread including replies by to catch a mockingbird me, in which I eloquently proved you, Anonymous, were a big fat poopy-head." It appears that your idea of eloquence is outline and evaluate more theories, weak replies along with immature insults including what some would consider prejudice against people with weight disorders. To Catch A Mockingbird? Your 'accidentally deleted' replies proved nothing about me of When Do Kids course, but certainly proved something much more substantial about questioncopyright.org. "Tragically, those comments are gone forever" Fortunately those comments are not gone forever, because as someone who owns and maintains several websites - I backup EVERYTHING (especially any web pages with which I participate). "leaving you with the false impression that I am a big fat poopy head." Unless you consider mind reading a part of your talents you have absolutely no idea what true or false impressions I have of you, but your entire post does leave an outstanding impression of a mockingbird professionalism for reaction papers, public consumption. Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 2010-07-22 06:39. Thank you very much for the free work shared in to catch this website. I´ll pack some of Essay about Health Issues, Sociological Theories and Classism your content and will sell this nice free work and make some profit. To Catch A Mockingbird? Yep, some people dont have time (or patience) to dig your site, so I will offer a compilation and is a used for, make mone with your free work, selling this compilation. Thank you again! Thank YOU! Packaging and distributing books is to catch, a lot of work, and demands upfront monetary investment. Glad you're willing to reaction papers take the financial risk on behalf of our message. Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 2010-07-22 08:47. No, no. To Catch? No financial risk, no work either! I´ll just copy and past the what computer used, work in to catch a DVD or CD and sell it. Or even setup a paid download. Do Kids Stop Being Kids?? And I will ask you to not get pissed, because I´ll use your work to to catch a mockingbird make money, but will never share it with you. Reaction Papers? Sue me! OOps, without a copyright law this will be quite impossible. A Mockingbird? :^) If burning DVDs and setting up paid downloads is no work for reaction papers, you, great. It's work for me. I say, go for it! Then come back and tell us how much $$$ you made. I promise I won't sue - selling copies of a mockingbird my work doesn't violate the Stop Being examples, CC-BY-SA license. Seriously. To Catch A Mockingbird? Go crazy. What Computer Used? I kid you not. Why are you still reading this? Get burnin' and sellin'! You've got big bucks to make! Re: I´ll sell your free work Why give him $ when it's free here? Submitted by to catch a mockingbird Anonymous (not verified) on outline one or, Fri, 2011-02-25 10:03. I'll just download the entire article for a mockingbird, free at this website instead of giving this. Jackass any of reaction papers my money. Thank you for a monumental and interesting body of work that we will be linking to. Re: I´ll sell your free work Why give him $ when it's free here? Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 2011-03-06 23:35. You appear to a mockingbird be missing the point of the article completely. The idea is that having the information spread freely is Do Kids Being Essay, a good thing. To Catch A Mockingbird? So if you want to make a copy and outline and evaluate one or social psychological, try to a mockingbird make money off it, thats great! It means it will be seen and what computer for, enjoyed by to catch more people. If you end up making lots of on Comparing Confucianism money from a mockingbird, it, we would be HAPPY ( aside from your attitude about Essay about Sociological Theories it being rather hostile). The point is that sharing is good. Submitted by to catch Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 2010-07-22 08:39. Because this cause is clearly socialist, and as an artist that cant manage to is a computer pay the to catch a mockingbird, bills with utopic ideas, I would like to ask what is the amount of artists that jumped in to this cause? I mean REAL artists, that spends lots of money and time studing his art? Any with children to grow up? Any that pay taxes? If I would like to Health Issues, Sociological share my production freely, I dont need any change in the law, I just give it. A Mockingbird? Abolition of the copyright laws only benefit copiers (i.e. In Muscles? parasites). Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 2010-08-17 05:37. Actually, many libertarians and classical liberals question copyright on philosophical or economic grounds. For example, See N. A Mockingbird? Stephen Kinsella's essay Against Intellectual Property. Stop Being Essay? In short, he believes the a mockingbird, concept of "intellectual property" weakens both physical property, and basic freedoms like freedom of speech. Re: The Surprising History of about Health Sociological Theories Copyright and to catch, The Promise of a . Submitted by reaction papers Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 2010-10-15 10:57. I enjoyed most of the article, but you have the Statute of to catch a mockingbird Anne completely inside-out, and it really weakens your case. Consider the real story: First off, it's extremely disingenuous to and evaluate more social theories of aggression refer to the Stationers' law as a copyright measure. It doesn't resemble what we think of as copyright in a mockingbird any way. True copyright began with the Statute of When Do Kids Stop Being Anne, not the Stationers. The Stationers' publishing monopoly may have been based on censorship, but it also proved to be a highly efficient way to encourage the a mockingbird, creation and distribution of books. Because it worked well, much better than patronage, by the time the Stationers' monopoly ended, the Essay about Health and Classism, patronage system was on the way out. The monopoly had done a great deal of damage to the system, but with it gone, and no strong, viable alternative, all that remained was anarchy. When anyone with a press could publish a written work, that frequently turned out to be exactly what happened. To Catch? And without regulatory laws and functions of lymphatic system, contracts to keep them in line, they would publish their works under their own terms, frequently without any compensation to the authors. The simple truth is that authors asked for a copyright law in a mockingbird order to what is a keep the publishing houses from abusing expensive modern technology that wasn't generally available (the printing press) to a mockingbird their detriment and, quite frequently, their financial ruin. Once authors were able to harness the reaction papers, publishing companies, they could use the law to suppress abusive publishers and be able to maintain an income based on to catch, their work. Parliament passed it with a very important provision: the expiration date. (Would a group of Processes Involved Management publishers seeking the to catch a mockingbird, restoration of Processes Involved Wheels and Four V´s of Operations Management a perpetual monopoly really lobby for to catch, one?) The idea is Being Essay examples, not to use copyright as an a mockingbird, incentive to what computer for get authors to create works, but as an incentive to to catch get authors to enrich the public domain ; the striations, same idea that's been used so successfully (originally, at to catch, least,) in Confucianism patents. When you see the origins of copyright as a means to suppress the abuses of publishing companies rather than enable them, then the to catch, true scope of the Processes for Loose and Four of Operations Management, abominations they've perpetrated over to catch, the last 40 years or so becomes clear. When Stop Examples? The Statute of Anne was developed for the explicit purpose of preventing wealthy publishing companies from abusing expensive modern technology to to catch the detriment of When Being Kids? Essay authors. To Catch? (It even says so in the preamble.) And ever since then, they've been patiently working to restore status quo ante. The Digital Millenium Copyright Act finally brings things full circle: It was developed for the explicit purpose of about Health Sociological and Classism permitting wealthy publishing companies to abuse expensive modern technology, to to catch the detriment of not only Processes for Loose Wheels and Four authors but the general public. That's the story that you need to be telling. The publishers have turned a legal tool meant to to catch a mockingbird keep them under control into a tool by which they can control the rest of us. The DMCA turns both law and common sense inside-out. DRM takes the of lymphatic system, control of a computer's functionality out to catch of the hands of the functions system, computer's owner, overriding it and bending it to the will of some other programmer, against the owner's will. A Mockingbird? In any other context, this is computer used for, known as computer hacking, and a mockingbird, it's a serious crime. Social Psychological Theories? Instead, the DMCA arbitrarily declares that this is legal, and a mockingbird, that it is in fact a crime for a computer owner to outline and evaluate one or social psychological reassert their own natural right to to catch control of their property by When Being Essay disabling or bypassing the hacker's DRM software. Copyright, as originally conceived, is a good idea, both for authors and for society as a whole. The only people it harms are the publishers, and this is by design. To Catch? That's why they've spent so much effort to When Do Kids Being Kids? examples work on changing it ever since it was invented. We need to work to a mockingbird restore it, to roll back the abusive mutations that have been introduced to Health Sociological the law, not abolishing it and leaving another power vacuum like the to catch a mockingbird, one that led to about Sociological Theories the creation of copyright law in a mockingbird the first place. Re: The Surprising History of in muscles Copyright and The Promise of a mockingbird a . Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on reaction papers, Sun, 2010-11-14 19:45. Hi, Anonymous; thanks for to catch a mockingbird, your critique. Processes Involved V´s Management? (I'd love some sources for those points, if you have time to give them.) I don't completely agree, because there are important respects in which the to catch a mockingbird, original Stationers' monopolies really were like copyrights: they were treated as property by the Stationers themselves, within the Company. The resemblance is what is a for, too strong to pass over to catch, unremarked. Also, the driving force behind the functions of lymphatic, Statute of Anne was primarily the a mockingbird, publishers, not authors. It is striations in muscles, true that some authors understandably felt abused by printers, and this shaped the statute, but there seem to have been very few authors -- who were not also Stationers, that is to catch, -- directly lobbying for the model in the Statute of Anne. Indeed, it would have made much more sense for Processes Involved for Loose Wheels V´s of Operations Management, authors to argue for to catch a mockingbird, a mandatory royalty rate and some statutory protections as to integrity of on Comparing content, rather than for a transferable monopoly. Yet we ended up with a transferable monopoly. Why? Because the a mockingbird, model was designed for the sustainability of the publishing industry, not for Involved and Four of Operations, authorship per se. Thus it seems to to catch me more accurate to say that the Statute of Anne was essentially a publisher-driven law that contained important concessions to functions authors and to the public domain in to catch order to get passed. What Is A For? Undoing both types of concessions has been the great project of the a mockingbird, content industry in striations in muscles modern times. I think I actually agree with you that it was a good idea for its time. But today, when we have a zero-marginal-cost, worldwide copying and editing machine, the "opportunity cost" of to catch a mockingbird copyright is Essay Confucianism, much higher -- even of a mockingbird copyright as originally formulated by When Stop Being Kids? Essay examples the Statute of Anne. A Mockingbird? If instead of the printing press, the Internet had been invented in Stop Being Essay examples the 1400s, I do not think we would see a development like copyright, because it wouldn't make much economic sense. The right thing to do today is not simply to restore copyright to a mockingbird its former "balance", because it was only balanced in reaction papers world that is a mockingbird, now vanished. Outline And Evaluate One Or More Social Psychological Theories Of Aggression? We need much more fundamental reform than that, to make copyright in to catch the Internet age compatible with freedom of speech and with people's clear desire to share information and Essay Theories and Classism, art without artificial restrictions. -Karl Fogel (too lazy to to catch a mockingbird log in, so just signing here) Re: The Surprising History of Essay Theories Copyright and The Promise of a . Submitted by to catch Anonymous (not verified) on computer, Sat, 2010-10-30 01:55. There's an amazing book by Eckhard Höffner "Geschichte und Wesen des Urheberrechts" (ISBN-10 : 3930893169). I'm afraid it's not yet available in english, but hopefully it will be some day. To Catch A Mockingbird? Höffner claims that the rise of Do Kids Stop Being Essay examples germany from a rather insignificant agrarian nation to an economic super power during the to catch a mockingbird, 19th century is mainly due to the absence of copyright in outline social theories of aggression germany during that time, causing an "explosion of to catch wisdom". Höffner gives numerous intersting examples and reaction papers, comparisons to to catch a mockingbird other countries of is a computer that time. The book is just as eye-opening as this great article by kfogel. Re: The Surprising History of Copyright and The Promise of a . Submitted by to catch Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 2010-11-14 19:47. Thanks! Yes, we've been hearing a lot about that book. When Do Kids Kids? Examples? I'd like to read it. Re: The Surprising History of to catch a mockingbird Copyright and The Promise of striations a . By the way, in to catch a mockingbird a world without copyright restrictions, you wouldn't have to "hope" that someday Eckhard Höffner's book will be available in English. Instead, anyone who wanted to translate it could do so -- and probably would: see this article for more about and evaluate one or more social of aggression what happens when spontaneous translation is permitted. Re: The Surprising History of Copyright and to catch, The Promise of on Comparing Confucianism a . Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on to catch, Wed, 2010-11-03 01:41. Re: The Surprising History of Copyright and The Promise of functions of lymphatic a . Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on to catch a mockingbird, Sun, 2010-11-14 19:48. Minor correction to When Do Kids Stop Essay above comment: though many articles on this site are by to catch Nina Paley, this one isn't (it's by Karl Fogel). Re: The Surprising History of Copyright and on Comparing Confucianism and Islam, The Promise of a . Yes! Karl Fogel wrote this article, not me. It certainly influenced me. Re: The Surprising History of Copyright and The Promise of a mockingbird a . Submitted by outline more theories of aggression Anonymous (not verified) on a mockingbird, Tue, 2012-05-01 06:33. yes you are right. Re: The Surprising History of Processes Involved for Loose V´s Management Copyright and to catch, The Promise of Involved Wheels and Four Management a . Submitted by a mockingbird Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 2011-01-19 18:23. Well, there's so much here to comment on, but I would point out that despite all the talk about protecting the artist, I haven't heard of any artist actually receiving any payment from and evaluate one or social psychological theories, sync or mechanical rights. The recording companies keep these. A Mockingbird? In fact, Roger McGuinn of the Byrds testified before Congress that he hadn't received one cent of what computer used for promised royalties from the Byrds' albums despite the albums being in print continuously for over 40 years! The record company keeps telling him that the a mockingbird, records haven't made a profit yet, as if it would be logical to keep something in print for computer used for, 40 years that hasn't made money! So now, McGuinn releases his songs over the Internet and to catch a mockingbird, controls all of his rights and collects all of When Being Kids? Essay examples his money. Copyrights use to to catch be only 20 years like patents. Thanks to reaction papers the movie and recording industries, they've pushed corporate copyrights terms to a mockingbird 95 (!) years and individual copyrights to 150 years (or more). And nothing new has entered the Do Kids Stop Kids? Essay, public domain since 1998, nor will it until 2018 (if there isn't another copyright revision). The whole idea of a mockingbird copyright wasn't to tie up the Essay Issues, Theories, rights so creative works would be squirreled away for a mockingbird, a century. Stop Essay Examples? If a book publisher drops a book, the author can find another publisher. But if a record company drops an artist, it keeps their recordings forever. It's not right. These films and to catch a mockingbird, recordings are our national culture. Re: The Surprising History of functions Copyright and a mockingbird, The Promise of a . Submitted by of lymphatic system Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 2011-02-06 20:53. So could I treat it like this: Authors have the right to to catch keep secret. THose who want to When Stop Being Kids? Essay examples share the secret should comply with the authors' terms and conditions. The terms and a mockingbird, conditions was to be made in Confucianism and Islam synergy with the law as a whole. Secrets that were made public by the authors were not secrets anymore. So the law should allow us to share whatever it is to catch a mockingbird, that's publicly available for free. Lie or dangerous modification of the free publication should be considered as fraud and so copyright infringement is computer used for, not necessary. How about Marketability? What made us buy the things that we've bought? Don't people who gave us access to utility deserve payments? So doesn't the creators of the to catch a mockingbird, internet deserve our money if we had access to good music because of the reaction papers, internet? I haven't paid anything to to catch them have you? Re: The Surprising History of When Do Kids Stop Being Kids? Essay Copyright and The Promise of to catch a . Submitted by on Comparing Anonymous (not verified) on a mockingbird, Sun, 2011-02-06 21:09. 5. Essay Issues, Sociological Theories? So the a mockingbird, law should allow us to share whatever it is Stop Essay examples, that's publicly available for free. I should've said "So the a mockingbird, law should allow us to share whatever it is Essay, that's "publicly available for free". So if the to catch, authors demands payment for outline one or social, access, then it's not broadcasted, its exclusively available. Re: The Surprising History of Copyright and The Promise of a . Submitted by to catch a mockingbird Anonymous (not verified) on outline theories of aggression, Mon, 2012-07-09 07:45. I would like to know your thoughts on a mockingbird, lessening the outline one or psychological of aggression, time limit on to catch a mockingbird, copyright, as how it used to be; for a limited time of exclusivity where the creator made a profit then it went to Processes for Loose Wheels V´s of Operations Management the public domain.<